PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAB.L vs. PZAKY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAB.L vs. PZAKY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA (PZAKY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BAB.L is traded in GBp, while PZAKY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PZAKY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAB.L achieves a -16.49% return, which is significantly lower than PZAKY's 6.07% return.


BAB.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-16.49%
6M
-11.73%
1Y
-1.13%
3Y*
49.51%
5Y*
29.01%
10Y*
2.11%

PZAKY

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.64%
YTD
6.07%
6M
-5.46%
1Y
52.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAB.L vs. PZAKY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
-16.49%150.05%19.17%
PZAKY
Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA
6.07%42.50%77.92%

Correlation

The correlation between BAB.L and PZAKY is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2024

-0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAB.L:

£5.32B

PZAKY:

$15.73B

EPS

BAB.L:

£0.94

PZAKY:

$7.34

PE Ratio

BAB.L:

11.09

PZAKY:

2.48

PS Ratio

BAB.L:

0.56

PZAKY:

0.27

PB Ratio

BAB.L:

7.35

PZAKY:

0.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAB.L:

£9.58B

PZAKY:

$58.77B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAB.L:

£699.70M

PZAKY:

$58.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAB.L:

£961.50M

PZAKY:

$24.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAB.L vs. PZAKY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAB.L
BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

PZAKY
PZAKY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PZAKY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZAKY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZAKY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PZAKY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZAKY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAB.L vs. PZAKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA (PZAKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAB.LPZAKYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.34

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

1.82

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

4.49

-4.57

BAB.L vs. PZAKY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAB.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the PZAKY Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAB.L and PZAKY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAB.LPZAKYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

0.69

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.86

-0.56

Drawdowns

BAB.L vs. PZAKY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, which is greater than PZAKY's maximum drawdown of -29.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB.L and PZAKY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAB.LPZAKYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.40%

-29.25%

-51.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.28%

-29.25%

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.89%

-16.39%

-14.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-5.57%

-22.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.04%

11.81%

+2.23%

Volatility

BAB.L vs. PZAKY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) is 11.68%, while Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA (PZAKY) has a volatility of 24.10%. This indicates that BAB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PZAKY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAB.LPZAKYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.68%

24.10%

-12.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.79%

59.29%

-33.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.92%

77.53%

-42.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.56%

67.12%

-33.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.38%

67.12%

-30.74%

Dividends

BAB.L vs. PZAKY - Dividend Comparison

BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than PZAKY's 6.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
0.67%0.56%1.06%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%6.08%4.04%2.75%2.38%
PZAKY
Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA
6.74%7.08%9.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BAB.L vs. PZAKY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock International Group plc and Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
2.54B
7.97B
(BAB.L) Total Revenue
(PZAKY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BAB.L values in GBp, PZAKY values in USD

BAB.L vs. PZAKY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Babcock International Group plc and Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
9.2%
100.0%
Portfolio components
BAB.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a gross profit of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

PZAKY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA reported a gross profit of 7.97B and revenue of 7.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BAB.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported an operating income of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

PZAKY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA reported an operating income of 3.84B and revenue of 7.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.2%.

BAB.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a net income of 169.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.

PZAKY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 7.97B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAB.L and PZAKY have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAB.L and PZAKY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer