BAB.L vs. MRO.L
BAB.L (Babcock International Group plc) and MRO.L (Melrose Industries plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — BAB.L in Engineering & Construction, MRO.L in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, BAB.L returned 2.49%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for MRO.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAB.L vs. MRO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAB.L achieves a -16.81% return, which is significantly higher than MRO.L's -20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, BAB.L has underperformed MRO.L with an annualized return of 2.49%, while MRO.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.
BAB.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- -16.81%
- 6M
- -17.15%
- 1Y
- 0.88%
- 3Y*
- 50.63%
- 5Y*
- 28.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
MRO.L
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -20.66%
- 6M
- -16.67%
- 1Y
- -0.69%
- 3Y*
- -3.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
BAB.L vs. MRO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | -16.81% | 150.05% | 27.98% | 40.56% | -11.42% | 13.83% | -55.53% | 36.99% | -27.77% | -23.36% |
MRO.L Melrose Industries plc | -20.66% | 7.50% | -1.49% | 102.51% | -15.46% | -19.88% | -25.38% | 48.20% | -22.05% | 8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAB.L and MRO.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
BAB.L:
£5.30B
MRO.L:
£5.82B
BAB.L:
£0.94
MRO.L:
£0.25
BAB.L:
11.05
MRO.L:
18.30
BAB.L:
0.55
MRO.L:
0.83
BAB.L:
7.32
MRO.L:
2.06
BAB.L:
£9.58B
MRO.L:
£7.06B
BAB.L:
£699.70M
MRO.L:
£1.78B
BAB.L:
£961.50M
MRO.L:
£1.58B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAB.L vs. MRO.L — Risk / Return Rank
BAB.L
MRO.L
BAB.L vs. MRO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) and Melrose Industries plc (MRO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAB.L | MRO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.03 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | -0.02 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | -0.05 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAB.L vs. MRO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -80.40%, which is greater than MRO.L's maximum drawdown of -70.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB.L and MRO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAB.L | MRO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.40% | -70.66% | -9.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.28% | -33.65% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.28% | -42.82% | +6.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.28% | -50.87% | +14.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.18% | -70.66% | -8.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.16% | -31.53% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.17% | -19.54% | -8.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.61% | 14.53% | +0.08% |
Volatility
BAB.L vs. MRO.L - Volatility Comparison
Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) has a higher volatility of 10.84% compared to Melrose Industries plc (MRO.L) at 10.23%. This indicates that BAB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAB.L | MRO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 10.23% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.75% | 28.31% | -2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.96% | 34.05% | +0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 39.76% | -6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.37% | 45.25% | -8.88% |
Dividends
BAB.L vs. MRO.L - Dividend Comparison
BAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than MRO.L's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB.L Babcock International Group plc | 0.68% | 0.56% | 1.06% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 6.08% | 4.04% | 2.75% | 2.38% |
MRO.L Melrose Industries plc | 1.56% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.34% | 0.27% | 0.93% | 1.25% | 0.73% | 0.95% | 6.95% |
Financials
BAB.L vs. MRO.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Babcock International Group plc and Melrose Industries plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BAB.L vs. MRO.L - Profitability Comparison
BAB.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a gross profit of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.
MRO.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Melrose Industries plc reported a gross profit of 500.00M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.
BAB.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported an operating income of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
MRO.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Melrose Industries plc reported an operating income of 443.00M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.
BAB.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a net income of 169.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.
MRO.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Melrose Industries plc reported a net income of 85.00M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BAB.L and MRO.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BAB.L and MRO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer