AZYY vs. LQTI
AZYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AZYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
AZYY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZYY achieves a -5.17% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.18% return.
AZYY
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -5.83%
- YTD
- -5.17%
- 6M
- -3.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AZYY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF | -5.17% | -5.33% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -0.18% | 0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZYY and LQTI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZYY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
AZYY
LQTI
AZYY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF (AZYY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AZYY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 0.83 | -1.46 |
Drawdowns
AZYY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZYY drawdown since its inception was -23.12%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZYY and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZYY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -3.41% | -19.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.06% | -1.77% | -13.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -0.88% | -11.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
AZYY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZYY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.92% | 5.15% | +16.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 6.01% | +15.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 6.01% | +15.91% |
AZYY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AZYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AZYY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
AZYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.15%, more than LQTI's 9.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AZYY GraniteShares YieldBoost AMZN ETF | 44.15% | 15.86% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.14% | 7.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AZYY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AZYY.
AZYY has the higher dividend yield at 44.15%, compared with 9.14% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AZYY and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for AZYY and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer