PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZTD vs. WDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AZTD vs. WDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZTD achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than WDIV's 14.29% return.


AZTD

1D
1.38%
1M
0.44%
6M
11.04%
YTD
16.64%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.25%

WDIV

1D
0.76%
1M
4.55%
6M
8.38%
YTD
14.29%
1Y
24.37%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
7.62%
ALL TIME*
7.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$217.95K$145.08K$54.87K
$856.14K$902.71K$623.54K

AZTD vs. WDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AZTD
Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF
16.64%25.46%6.87%10.34%-1.79%
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
14.29%27.16%7.61%8.21%-4.22%

Correlation

The correlation between AZTD and WDIV is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022

0.72

The correlation between AZTD and WDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

AZTD vs. WDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AZTD
WDIV

Financial Services

21.5%
22.5%

Industrials

20.9%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

19.8%
4.2%

Technology

14.3%
4.6%

Healthcare

9.7%
3.9%

Basic Materials

4.0%
3.4%

Communication Services

3.3%
9.4%

Energy

2.5%
7.1%

Utilities

1.9%
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
6.6%

Real Estate

-

12.8%

Financial Services

AZTD
21.5%
WDIV
22.5%

Industrials

AZTD
20.9%
WDIV
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AZTD
19.8%
WDIV
4.2%

Technology

AZTD
14.3%
WDIV
4.6%

Healthcare

AZTD
9.7%
WDIV
3.9%

Basic Materials

AZTD
4.0%
WDIV
3.4%

Communication Services

AZTD
3.3%
WDIV
9.4%

Energy

AZTD
2.5%
WDIV
7.1%

Utilities

AZTD
1.9%
WDIV
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

AZTD
1.6%
WDIV
6.6%

Real Estate

AZTD

-

WDIV
12.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZTD vs. WDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AZTD
AZTD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
AZTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZTD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AZTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZTD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

WDIV
WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AZTD vs. WDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AZTDWDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.45

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.84

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

10.59

-4.63

AZTD vs. WDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the WDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZTD and WDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AZTD vs. WDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZTD drawdown since its inception was -16.75%, smaller than the maximum WDIV drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZTD and WDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZTDWDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.75%

-42.34%

+25.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-8.61%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.75%

-9.20%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

0.00%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-5.79%

+1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.31%

+1.19%

Volatility

AZTD vs. WDIV - Volatility Comparison

Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) at 2.43%. This indicates that AZTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZTDWDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

2.43%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.62%

8.35%

+5.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

10.12%

+7.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.44%

12.72%

+5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

15.15%

+3.29%

AZTD vs. WDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AZTD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WDIV's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

AZTD vs. WDIV - Dividend Comparison

AZTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than WDIV's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZTD
Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF
0.90%1.05%1.87%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
4.05%4.27%4.63%4.73%5.12%4.15%5.55%3.99%4.42%3.62%4.32%5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


AZTD and WDIV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AZTD has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to WDIV (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZTD dropped -16.75% vs WDIV's -42.34%.

On 3-year performance, WDIV leads with 18.65% vs 17.02% for AZTD. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, WDIV has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 17.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AZTD.

WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 0.90% for AZTD.

AZTD tracks Solactive Aztlan Global Developed Markets SMID Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AZTD and 0.40% for WDIV.

WDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZTD and WDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer