PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZTD vs. ISRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AZTD vs. ISRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AZTD having a 13.87% return and ISRA slightly higher at 14.50%.


AZTD

1D
0.93%
1M
0.74%
YTD
13.87%
6M
15.86%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
10Y*

ISRA

1D
0.39%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
14.50%
6M
16.99%
1Y
41.47%
3Y*
26.23%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
10.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZTD vs. ISRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AZTD
Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF
13.87%25.46%6.87%10.34%-1.54%
ISRA
VanEck Israel ETF
14.50%36.98%26.03%-0.08%-18.34%

Correlation

The correlation between AZTD and ISRA is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022

0.66

The correlation between AZTD and ISRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

AZTD vs. ISRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AZTD
ISRA

Technology

25.3%
22.2%

Consumer Cyclical

22.3%
1.9%

Industrials

18.2%
10.5%

Financial Services

14.4%
38.3%

Healthcare

7.8%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
1.5%

Basic Materials

3.0%
0.2%

Utilities

2.0%
5.0%

Communication Services

1.6%
1.8%

Energy

1.4%
2.1%

Real Estate

-

4.7%

Technology

AZTD
25.3%
ISRA
22.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AZTD
22.3%
ISRA
1.9%

Industrials

AZTD
18.2%
ISRA
10.5%

Financial Services

AZTD
14.4%
ISRA
38.3%

Healthcare

AZTD
7.8%
ISRA
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

AZTD
4.0%
ISRA
1.5%

Basic Materials

AZTD
3.0%
ISRA
0.2%

Utilities

AZTD
2.0%
ISRA
5.0%

Communication Services

AZTD
1.6%
ISRA
1.8%

Energy

AZTD
1.4%
ISRA
2.1%

Real Estate

AZTD

-

ISRA
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZTD vs. ISRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZTD
AZTD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AZTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZTD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AZTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZTD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ISRA
ISRA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ISRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZTD vs. ISRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AZTDISRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.78

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

14.30

-6.72

AZTD vs. ISRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the ISRA Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZTD and ISRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AZTDISRADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.00

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.47

+0.30

Drawdowns

AZTD vs. ISRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZTD drawdown since its inception was -16.75%, smaller than the maximum ISRA drawdown of -45.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZTD and ISRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZTDISRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.75%

-45.02%

+28.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-11.02%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.75%

-27.74%

+10.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-4.35%

+2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-11.18%

+7.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.91%

+0.46%

Volatility

AZTD vs. ISRA - Volatility Comparison

Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA) have volatilities of 5.06% and 5.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZTDISRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

5.18%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

14.88%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.35%

20.84%

-3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

21.86%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.55%

20.91%

-2.36%

AZTD vs. ISRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AZTD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ISRA's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

AZTD vs. ISRA - Dividend Comparison

AZTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than ISRA's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZTD
Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF
0.92%1.05%1.87%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISRA
VanEck Israel ETF
1.29%1.48%1.21%1.89%1.36%1.28%0.17%1.38%0.76%1.58%1.62%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


AZTD and ISRA have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISRA has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to AZTD (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZTD dropped -16.75% vs ISRA's -45.02%.

On 3-year performance, ISRA leads with 26.23% vs 17.68% for AZTD. On fees, ISRA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, AZTD has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ISRA has performed better with a 26.23% return vs 17.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISRA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AZTD.

ISRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.92% for AZTD.

AZTD tracks Solactive Aztlan Global Developed Markets SMID Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ISRA tracks BlueStar Israel Global Index. They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AZTD and 0.59% for ISRA.

ISRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZTD and ISRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer