AZTD vs. INFL

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

AZTD (Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF) and INFL (Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AZTD is passively managed, while INFL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AZTD returned 17.02%/yr vs 18.82%/yr for INFL. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AZTD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for INFL.

Performance

AZTD vs. INFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AZTD having a 16.64% return and INFL slightly lower at 16.12%.

AZTD

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 11.04%
• YTD: 16.64%
• 1Y: 20.83%
• 3Y*: 17.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.25%

INFL

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 3.27%
• 6M: 5.53%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 1Y: 23.55%
• 3Y*: 18.82%
• 5Y*: 13.01%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF	$217.95K	$145.08K	$54.87K
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	$5.25M	$5.01M	$13.11M

AZTD vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF	16.64%	25.46%	6.87%	10.34%	-1.79%
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	16.12%	18.30%	23.34%	1.62%	1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between AZTD and INFL is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022	0.62

The correlation between AZTD and INFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AZTD vs. INFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AZTD	INFL
Financial Services	21.5%	20.6%
Industrials	20.9%	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	19.8%	-
Technology	14.3%	-
Healthcare	9.7%	1.3%
Basic Materials	4.0%	19.1%
Communication Services	3.3%	0.3%
Energy	2.5%	43.4%
Utilities	1.9%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	1.9%
Real Estate	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

AZTD vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AZTD

AZTD Risk / Return Rank: 43
AZTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AZTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
AZTD Omega Ratio Rank: 40
AZTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
AZTD Martin Ratio Rank: 47

INFL

INFL Risk / Return Rank: 48
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AZTD vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AZTD	INFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	1.46	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.91	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.25	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	1.94	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.96	5.15	+0.81

AZTD vs. INFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the INFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZTD and INFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AZTD vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZTD drawdown since its inception was -16.75%, smaller than the maximum INFL drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZTD and INFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AZTD	INFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.75%	-21.30%	+4.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.19%	-12.20%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.75%	-15.56%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-6.39%	+5.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-5.20%	+1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	4.58%	-1.08%

Volatility

AZTD vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison

Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) at 2.86%. This indicates that AZTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AZTD	INFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	2.86%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.62%	11.98%	+1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.58%	16.35%	+1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.44%	17.74%	+0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.44%	17.58%	+0.86%

AZTD vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AZTD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than INFL's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

AZTD vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison

AZTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than INFL's 0.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF	0.90%	1.05%	1.87%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF	0.80%	1.26%	1.77%	1.60%	1.65%	0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AZTD and INFL in my portfolio?

AZTD and INFL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AZTD or INFL?

AZTD has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to INFL (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZTD dropped -16.75% vs INFL's -21.30%.

Which ETF is better, AZTD or INFL?

On 3-year performance, INFL leads with 18.82% vs 17.02% for AZTD. On fees, AZTD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, INFL has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AZTD or INFL?

Over the 3-year period, INFL has performed better with a 18.82% return vs 17.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AZTD or INFL?

AZTD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INFL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AZTD or INFL?

AZTD has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.80% for INFL.

What is the main difference between AZTD and INFL?

They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and Horizon Kinetics. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AZTD and 0.85% for INFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.