PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZTD vs. GVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AZTD vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZTD achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 15.66% return.


AZTD

1D
0.95%
1M
1.30%
YTD
14.72%
6M
12.64%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
17.36%
5Y*
10Y*

GVAL

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.41%
YTD
15.66%
6M
15.12%
1Y
38.99%
3Y*
26.70%
5Y*
13.89%
10Y*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZTD vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AZTD
Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF
14.72%25.46%6.87%10.34%-1.79%
GVAL
Cambria Global Value ETF
15.66%55.87%2.59%13.30%8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AZTD and GVAL is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022

0.63

The correlation between AZTD and GVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

AZTD vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AZTD
GVAL

Consumer Cyclical

21.1%
2.7%

Technology

20.7%
9.4%

Industrials

17.9%
3.6%

Financial Services

14.6%
16.9%

Healthcare

8.8%

-

Energy

5.8%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
1.8%

Communication Services

3.9%
4.3%

Basic Materials

3.6%
7.7%

Utilities

3.6%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AZTD
21.1%
GVAL
2.7%

Technology

AZTD
20.7%
GVAL
9.4%

Industrials

AZTD
17.9%
GVAL
3.6%

Financial Services

AZTD
14.6%
GVAL
16.9%

Healthcare

AZTD
8.8%
GVAL

-

Energy

AZTD
5.8%
GVAL
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

AZTD
4.0%
GVAL
1.8%

Communication Services

AZTD
3.9%
GVAL
4.3%

Basic Materials

AZTD
3.6%
GVAL
7.7%

Utilities

AZTD
3.6%
GVAL
3.7%

Real Estate

AZTD

-

GVAL
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZTD vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZTD
AZTD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AZTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZTD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AZTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZTD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GVAL
GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZTD vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AZTDGVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.41

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.18

12.90

-5.72

AZTD vs. GVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the GVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZTD and GVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AZTD vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZTD drawdown since its inception was -16.75%, smaller than the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZTD and GVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZTDGVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.75%

-46.82%

+30.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-11.50%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.75%

-15.72%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-3.75%

+2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-13.82%

+9.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

3.03%

+0.41%

Volatility

AZTD vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) is 4.77%, while Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that AZTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZTDGVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

6.42%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

13.83%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.68%

15.53%

+2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

18.60%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.55%

19.00%

-0.45%

AZTD vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AZTD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

AZTD vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison

AZTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than GVAL's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZTD
Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF
0.92%1.05%1.87%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GVAL
Cambria Global Value ETF
2.47%2.93%4.75%6.12%5.05%2.97%1.90%2.84%4.65%2.00%2.54%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


AZTD and GVAL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVAL has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to AZTD (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZTD dropped -16.75% vs GVAL's -46.82%.

On 3-year performance, GVAL leads with 26.70% vs 17.36% for AZTD. On fees, GVAL is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, AZTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 26.70% return vs 17.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GVAL is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AZTD.

GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.92% for AZTD.

They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AZTD and 0.64% for GVAL.

GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZTD and GVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer