AZO vs. DBMF
AZO (AutoZone, Inc.) is a stock, while DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) is Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Over the past 5 years, AZO returned 15.86%/yr vs 7.92%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AZO vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZO achieves a -8.96% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 8.91% return.
AZO
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -9.36%
- YTD
- -8.96%
- 6M
- -10.66%
- 1Y
- -13.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- 14.90%
DBMF
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 25.13%
- 3Y*
- 8.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- —
AZO vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZO AutoZone, Inc. | -8.96% | 5.92% | 23.84% | 4.84% | 17.64% | 76.84% | -0.49% | 17.33% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 8.91% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZO and DBMF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.04 |
The correlation between AZO and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZO vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
AZO
DBMF
AZO vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AZO | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.42 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 4.14 | -4.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 14.62 | -15.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AZO vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZO drawdown since its inception was -46.32%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZO and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZO | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.32% | -20.39% | -25.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.59% | -6.10% | -26.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.59% | -15.60% | -16.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.59% | -20.39% | -12.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.09% | -3.12% | -25.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -6.55% | -4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.26% | 1.72% | +14.54% |
Volatility
AZO vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) has a higher volatility of 12.50% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 3.13%. This indicates that AZO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZO | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.50% | 3.13% | +9.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.26% | 10.09% | +12.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.69% | 12.48% | +15.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.57% | 12.53% | +12.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.54% | 12.41% | +14.13% |
Dividends
AZO vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
AZO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZO AutoZone, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.25% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AZO and DBMF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AZO has higher volatility (12.50%) compared to DBMF (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZO dropped -46.32% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AZO and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer