PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AZNIX vs. ANNPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AZNIX vs. ANNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Income & Growth Fund (AZNIX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AZNIX achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than ANNPX's 20.69% return. Over the past 10 years, AZNIX has underperformed ANNPX with an annualized return of 9.53%, while ANNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.48% annualized return.


AZNIX

1D
0.46%
1M
3.47%
YTD
9.93%
6M
10.04%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
9.53%

ANNPX

1D
0.87%
1M
5.62%
YTD
20.69%
6M
21.05%
1Y
44.80%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
14.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZNIX vs. ANNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AZNIX
Virtus Income & Growth Fund
9.93%11.97%11.24%18.99%-19.58%11.81%23.37%20.81%-5.56%13.05%
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
20.69%22.50%14.13%8.39%-18.65%4.96%55.99%26.45%2.76%15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between AZNIX and ANNPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007

0.93

The correlation between AZNIX and ANNPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AZNIX vs. ANNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZNIX
AZNIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AZNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
AZNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ANNPX
ANNPX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ANNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ANNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZNIX vs. ANNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Income & Growth Fund (AZNIX) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AZNIXANNPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

3.27

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.42

4.21

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.57

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

6.39

-2.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.82

28.32

-11.50

AZNIX vs. ANNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AZNIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the ANNPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AZNIX and ANNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AZNIXANNPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

3.27

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.70

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

1.07

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.55

+0.08

Drawdowns

AZNIX vs. ANNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZNIX drawdown since its inception was -45.11%, smaller than the maximum ANNPX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZNIX and ANNPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AZNIXANNPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.11%

-55.61%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.16%

-7.15%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.59%

-13.67%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.92%

-26.85%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.24%

-27.36%

+1.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-17.45%

+11.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.61%

-0.36%

Volatility

AZNIX vs. ANNPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Income & Growth Fund (AZNIX) is 2.76%, while Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that AZNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AZNIXANNPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

4.54%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

11.23%

-4.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.67%

13.97%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.74%

12.83%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

13.58%

-2.18%

AZNIX vs. ANNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AZNIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than ANNPX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

AZNIX vs. ANNPX - Dividend Comparison

AZNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, less than ANNPX's 9.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
9.33%11.32%2.31%2.56%1.55%20.74%6.94%5.12%18.79%23.47%2.88%10.63%
AZNIX
Virtus Income & Growth Fund
6.55%7.00%7.29%7.49%8.26%6.21%6.59%8.18%7.22%7.82%8.94%9.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AZNIX and ANNPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANNPX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to AZNIX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZNIX dropped -45.11% vs ANNPX's -55.61%.

ANNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AZNIX and ANNPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer