AZN vs. ASTS
AZN (AstraZeneca PLC) and ASTS (AST SpaceMobile, Inc.) are both stocks. AZN operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while ASTS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, AZN returned 12.08%/yr vs 54.02%/yr for ASTS. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AZN vs. ASTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZN achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than ASTS's 26.75% return.
AZN
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- 15.85%
ASTS
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- 22.66%
- YTD
- 26.75%
- 6M
- 24.41%
- 1Y
- 195.16%
- 3Y*
- 152.04%
- 5Y*
- 54.02%
- 10Y*
- —
AZN vs. ASTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 0.81% | 43.30% | -0.62% | 1.44% | 19.14% | 19.66% | 3.12% | 3.04% |
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 26.75% | 244.22% | 249.92% | 25.10% | -39.29% | -41.53% | 37.59% | 1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZN and ASTS is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
AZN:
$283.40B
ASTS:
$26.76B
AZN:
$6.66
ASTS:
-$1.84
AZN:
4.69
ASTS:
287.63
AZN:
5.99
ASTS:
10.06
AZN:
$60.44B
ASTS:
$84.94M
AZN:
$49.37B
ASTS:
-$22.93M
AZN:
$20.47B
ASTS:
-$536.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZN vs. ASTS — Risk / Return Rank
AZN
ASTS
AZN vs. ASTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AZN | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.28 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 4.12 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 8.15 | -3.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AZN | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.88 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.50 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.40 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
AZN vs. ASTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZN drawdown since its inception was -48.94%, smaller than the maximum ASTS drawdown of -91.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZN and ASTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZN | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.94% | -91.07% | +42.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.43% | -47.69% | +32.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.87% | -70.66% | +42.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.87% | -85.57% | +57.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.90% | -30.83% | +17.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -43.38% | +32.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.75% | 24.06% | -18.31% |
Volatility
AZN vs. ASTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) is 7.42%, while AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) has a volatility of 40.76%. This indicates that AZN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZN | ASTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 40.76% | -33.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.47% | 82.89% | -65.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.55% | 104.86% | -79.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 109.43% | -85.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 100.53% | -75.59% |
Dividends
AZN vs. ASTS - Dividend Comparison
AZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, while ASTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AZN AstraZeneca PLC | 2.93% | 1.70% | 2.27% | 2.15% | 2.12% | 2.35% | 2.80% | 2.81% | 3.69% | 3.95% | 5.01% | 4.06% |
Financials
AZN vs. ASTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AstraZeneca PLC and AST SpaceMobile, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AZN and ASTS have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASTS has higher volatility (40.76%) compared to AZN (7.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZN dropped -48.94% vs ASTS's -91.07%.
ASTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AZN and ASTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer