AYEM.DE vs. DBMF
AYEM.DE (iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AYEM.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets IMI ESG Screened, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. AYEM.DE is passively managed, while DBMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AYEM.DE returned 8.22%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AYEM.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.
Performance
AYEM.DE vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AYEM.DE is traded in EUR, while DBMF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DBMF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AYEM.DE achieves a 28.03% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 12.85% return.
AYEM.DE
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 28.03%
- 6M
- 29.61%
- 1Y
- 45.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- —
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 12.85%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 28.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
AYEM.DE vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AYEM.DE iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.03% | 17.41% | 14.03% | 6.81% | -14.62% | 6.17% | 7.79% | 8.90% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 12.85% | 0.34% | 14.32% | -11.67% | 29.14% | 19.83% | -6.59% | 10.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between AYEM.DE and DBMF is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.15 |
Over the past year, AYEM.DE and DBMF have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AYEM.DE vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
AYEM.DE
DBMF
AYEM.DE vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AYEM.DE) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AYEM.DE | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.45 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 5.19 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.44 | 18.31 | -3.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AYEM.DE vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AYEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.12%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AYEM.DE and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AYEM.DE | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.12% | -29.19% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.01% | -5.53% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | -19.60% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.43% | -29.19% | +5.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -6.97% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.74% | -12.86% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 1.56% | +1.59% |
Volatility
AYEM.DE vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AYEM.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 3.05%. This indicates that AYEM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AYEM.DE | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 3.05% | +5.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 10.07% | +6.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.99% | 12.96% | +6.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 16.05% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 15.30% | +4.10% |
AYEM.DE vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AYEM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
AYEM.DE vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
AYEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AYEM.DE iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.24% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AYEM.DE and DBMF have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AYEM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AYEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
AYEM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AYEM.DE and 0.85% for DBMF.
Find the right allocation for AYEM.DE and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer