PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AYEM.DE vs. IEAC.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AYEM.DE vs. IEAC.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AYEM.DE) and iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AYEM.DE vs. IEAC.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AYEM.DE
iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.19%17.51%14.02%6.81%-14.64%6.10%7.92%21.67%1.83%
IEAC.AS
iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF
-0.46%3.05%4.40%7.74%-13.63%-1.02%2.55%6.29%-0.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AYEM.DE achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly higher than IEAC.AS's -0.46% return.


AYEM.DE

1D
-1.25%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
4.19%
6M
7.06%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*

IEAC.AS

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
2.50%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*
0.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AYEM.DE vs. IEAC.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AYEM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IEAC.AS's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

AYEM.DE vs. IEAC.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AYEM.DE
AYEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AYEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AYEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IEAC.AS
IEAC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IEAC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEAC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEAC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IEAC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEAC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AYEM.DE vs. IEAC.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AYEM.DE) and iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AYEM.DEIEAC.ASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

0.91

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.29

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.17

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

1.26

+1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.56

5.54

+4.02

AYEM.DE vs. IEAC.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AYEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the IEAC.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AYEM.DE and IEAC.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AYEM.DEIEAC.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

0.91

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

-0.04

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.77

-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between AYEM.DE and IEAC.AS is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AYEM.DE vs. IEAC.AS - Dividend Comparison

AYEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEAC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AYEM.DE
iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEAC.AS
iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF
3.36%3.29%3.39%2.51%0.84%0.81%0.84%1.10%0.98%1.52%1.66%0.90%

Drawdowns

AYEM.DE vs. IEAC.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AYEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, which is greater than IEAC.AS's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AYEM.DE and IEAC.AS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AYEM.DEIEAC.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-17.26%

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-2.65%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.38%

-17.26%

-6.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.33%

-2.02%

-7.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-2.74%

-5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

0.60%

+2.30%

Volatility

AYEM.DE vs. IEAC.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AYEM.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) at 1.44%. This indicates that AYEM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEAC.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AYEM.DEIEAC.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

1.44%

+5.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

1.91%

+11.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.99%

2.71%

+15.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

4.34%

+11.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

4.30%

+14.15%