PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AXGN vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AXGN vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AxoGen, Inc. (AXGN) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AXGN achieves a 24.14% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, AXGN has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 21.66%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.


AXGN

1D
2.97%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
24.14%
6M
43.42%
1Y
257.66%
3Y*
66.26%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
21.66%

BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AXGN vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AXGN
AxoGen, Inc.
24.14%98.60%141.29%-31.56%6.51%-47.65%0.06%-12.43%-27.81%214.44%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.49%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AXGN and BIL is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

-0.01

The correlation between AXGN and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AXGN vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AXGN
AXGN Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
AXGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXGN Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AXGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXGN Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AXGN vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AxoGen, Inc. (AXGN) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AXGNBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-14.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-169.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

87.91

-86.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.44

355.35

-341.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

43.94

2,817.77

-2,773.83

AXGN vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AXGN Sharpe Ratio is 4.78, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AXGN and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AXGNBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78

19.71

-14.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

13.16

-12.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

8.52

-8.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

2.78

-2.72

Drawdowns

AXGN vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AXGN drawdown since its inception was -98.49%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXGN and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AXGNBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.49%

-0.78%

-97.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.30%

-0.01%

-19.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.36%

-0.01%

-62.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.69%

-0.10%

-83.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.54%

-0.21%

-93.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.32%

0.00%

-27.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.90%

-0.26%

-64.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.25%

0.00%

+6.25%

Volatility

AXGN vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

AxoGen, Inc. (AXGN) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that AXGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AXGNBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.77%

0.05%

+9.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.39%

0.13%

+37.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.34%

0.20%

+54.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.09%

0.26%

+63.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.05%

0.26%

+61.79%

Dividends

AXGN vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

AXGN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AXGN
AxoGen, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


AXGN and BIL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AXGN has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AXGN dropped -98.49% vs BIL's -0.78%.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 4.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AXGN and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer