AXBAX vs. SWPPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio (AXBAX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX).
AXBAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Mar 3, 2004. SWPPX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 1997.
Performance
AXBAX vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AXBAX vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AXBAX Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio | -4.42% | 19.12% | 15.47% | 19.89% | -19.11% | 16.33% | 14.11% | 23.88% | -9.47% | 22.31% |
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund | -7.07% | 17.87% | 24.96% | 26.26% | -18.14% | 28.67% | 18.38% | 31.46% | -4.47% | 21.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AXBAX achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly higher than SWPPX's -7.07% return. Over the past 10 years, AXBAX has underperformed SWPPX with an annualized return of 9.34%, while SWPPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.
AXBAX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.67%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
SWPPX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -7.65%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 6M
- -4.58%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AXBAX vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AXBAX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AXBAX vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank
AXBAX
SWPPX
AXBAX vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio (AXBAX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AXBAX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.84 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 1.30 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.06 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.98 | 5.14 | +1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AXBAX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.84 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.68 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.76 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between AXBAX and SWPPX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AXBAX vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison
AXBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than SWPPX's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AXBAX Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio | 10.26% | 9.81% | 5.23% | 5.43% | 7.50% | 13.35% | 5.91% | 7.55% | 10.64% | 7.46% | 3.76% | 7.23% |
SWPPX Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund | 1.19% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.67% | 1.27% | 1.81% | 1.95% | 2.67% | 1.79% | 2.55% | 3.17% |
Drawdowns
AXBAX vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AXBAX drawdown since its inception was -50.83%, smaller than the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXBAX and SWPPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AXBAX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.83% | -55.06% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.14% | -12.10% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.78% | -24.51% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.27% | -33.80% | +2.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.03% | -8.89% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -10.00% | +3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 2.49% | -0.38% |
Volatility
AXBAX vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio (AXBAX) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AXBAX | SWPPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 4.29% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 9.11% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 18.14% | -3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 16.89% | -2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.76% | 18.19% | -3.43% |