AXBAX vs. SMGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio (AXBAX) and Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX).
AXBAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Mar 3, 2004. SMGIX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Dec 14, 1992.
Performance
AXBAX vs. SMGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AXBAX vs. SMGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AXBAX Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio | -4.42% | 19.12% | 15.47% | 19.89% | -19.11% | 16.33% | 14.11% | 23.88% | -9.47% | 22.31% |
SMGIX Columbia Contrarian Core Fund | -8.32% | 17.35% | 23.33% | 32.12% | -18.64% | 24.18% | 22.21% | 32.95% | -8.95% | 20.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AXBAX achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly higher than SMGIX's -8.32% return. Over the past 10 years, AXBAX has underperformed SMGIX with an annualized return of 9.34%, while SMGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.
AXBAX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.67%
- 1Y
- 16.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
SMGIX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -7.29%
- YTD
- -8.32%
- 6M
- -5.97%
- 1Y
- 12.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AXBAX vs. SMGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AXBAX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SMGIX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AXBAX vs. SMGIX — Risk / Return Rank
AXBAX
SMGIX
AXBAX vs. SMGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio (AXBAX) and Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AXBAX | SMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.71 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 1.12 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 0.87 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.98 | 3.72 | +3.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AXBAX | SMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.71 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.56 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.68 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.67 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between AXBAX and SMGIX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AXBAX vs. SMGIX - Dividend Comparison
AXBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than SMGIX's 8.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AXBAX Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio | 10.26% | 9.81% | 5.23% | 5.43% | 7.50% | 13.35% | 5.91% | 7.55% | 10.64% | 7.46% | 3.76% | 7.23% |
SMGIX Columbia Contrarian Core Fund | 8.06% | 7.39% | 9.69% | 3.08% | 10.61% | 13.70% | 7.69% | 5.87% | 10.17% | 4.89% | 0.76% | 5.86% |
Drawdowns
AXBAX vs. SMGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AXBAX drawdown since its inception was -50.83%, roughly equal to the maximum SMGIX drawdown of -50.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXBAX and SMGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AXBAX | SMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.83% | -50.62% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.14% | -12.33% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.78% | -32.20% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.27% | -32.45% | +1.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.03% | -9.99% | +1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -6.77% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 2.89% | -0.78% |
Volatility
AXBAX vs. SMGIX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio (AXBAX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Columbia Contrarian Core Fund (SMGIX) at 4.18%. This indicates that AXBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AXBAX | SMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 4.18% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 9.28% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 18.55% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 18.96% | -4.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.76% | 18.95% | -4.19% |