AXBAX vs. VGT

In the year-to-date period, AXBAX achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's -12.16% return. Over the past 10 years, AXBAX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 1.23%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 18.74% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

AXBAX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio (AXBAX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AXBAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AXBAX and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AXBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than VGT's 0.58% yield.

The maximum AXBAX drawdown since its inception was -56.66%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AXBAX and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio (AXBAX) is 10.74%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 19.14%. This indicates that AXBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.