AWP vs. RQI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AWP (abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund) is REIT fund actively managed by abrdn, while RQI (Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AWP returned 7.29%/yr vs 7.83%/yr for RQI. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AWP charges 1.19%/yr vs 2.21%/yr for RQI.

Performance

AWP vs. RQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWP achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly lower than RQI's 12.82% return. Over the past 10 years, AWP has underperformed RQI with an annualized return of 7.29%, while RQI has yielded a comparatively higher 7.83% annualized return.

AWP

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 6.57%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: 10.39%
• 3Y*: 14.34%
• 5Y*: 1.33%
• 10Y*: 7.29%

RQI

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -6.65%
• YTD: 12.82%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 8.43%
• 3Y*: 12.66%
• 5Y*: 3.69%
• 10Y*: 7.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWP vs. RQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund	6.57%	12.43%	12.23%	12.58%	-37.13%	40.41%	-10.29%	42.52%	-18.47%	44.91%
RQI Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund	12.82%	2.07%	8.04%	15.74%	-31.07%	56.64%	-9.28%	54.62%	-11.11%	11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AWP and RQI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2007	0.62

The correlation between AWP and RQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AWP vs. RQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWP

AWP Risk / Return Rank: 9
AWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
AWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
AWP Omega Ratio Rank: 9
AWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
AWP Martin Ratio Rank: 11

RQI

RQI Risk / Return Rank: 57
RQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
RQI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RQI Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWP vs. RQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) and Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AWP	RQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	0.54	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.09	0.81	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.10	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	0.72	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.85	2.04	+0.81

AWP vs. RQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWP Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the RQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWP and RQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AWP vs. RQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWP drawdown since its inception was -85.93%, smaller than the maximum RQI drawdown of -91.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWP and RQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AWP	RQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.93%	-91.59%	+5.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.14%	-11.74%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.09%	-22.43%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.93%	-41.06%	-2.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.95%	-59.12%	+5.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.83%	-8.10%	+3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.32%	-17.90%	-9.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.65%	4.13%	-0.48%

Volatility

AWP vs. RQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund (AWP) is 4.70%, while Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that AWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AWP	RQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	6.20%	-1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.30%	12.87%	-1.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.28%	15.91%	-1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.06%	23.01%	-0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.61%	26.98%	-3.37%

AWP vs. RQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWP has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RQI's 2.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

AWP vs. RQI - Dividend Comparison

AWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.47%, more than RQI's 9.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AWP abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund	12.47%	12.50%	12.44%	12.37%	12.31%	7.02%	9.13%	8.49%	12.05%	8.90%	11.70%	10.40%
RQI Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund	9.31%	9.54%	7.84%	7.84%	10.41%	5.27%	7.74%	6.79%	9.27%	7.59%	7.86%	7.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AWP and RQI in my portfolio?

AWP and RQI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AWP or RQI?

RQI has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to AWP (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWP dropped -85.93% vs RQI's -91.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.