PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWIIX vs. CGJIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AWIIX vs. CGJIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CIBC Atlas Income Opportunities Fund (AWIIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWIIX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than CGJIX's 12.35% return. Over the past 10 years, AWIIX has underperformed CGJIX with an annualized return of 8.23%, while CGJIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.80% annualized return.


AWIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.75%
YTD
1.60%
6M
0.92%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
8.23%

CGJIX

1D
0.13%
1M
6.98%
YTD
12.35%
6M
11.64%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
23.19%
5Y*
14.53%
10Y*
17.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWIIX vs. CGJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AWIIX
CIBC Atlas Income Opportunities Fund
1.60%7.20%7.10%15.07%-14.79%18.62%11.92%23.32%-3.53%13.79%
CGJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund
12.35%14.56%27.74%36.66%-26.84%26.13%38.69%35.29%0.74%27.39%

Correlation

The correlation between AWIIX and CGJIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.87

The correlation between AWIIX and CGJIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWIIX vs. CGJIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWIIX
AWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
AWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CGJIX
CGJIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CGJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CGJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWIIX vs. CGJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Atlas Income Opportunities Fund (AWIIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AWIIXCGJIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

2.22

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

3.01

-1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.39

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.68

-1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.67

11.47

-5.80

AWIIX vs. CGJIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the CGJIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWIIX and CGJIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AWIIXCGJIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.22

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.74

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.89

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.88

-0.23

Drawdowns

AWIIX vs. CGJIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWIIX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum CGJIX drawdown of -31.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWIIX and CGJIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWIIXCGJIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.07%

-31.18%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.91%

-11.15%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-21.90%

+9.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.90%

-31.18%

+11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.07%

-31.18%

+4.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-5.46%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

2.60%

-1.17%

Volatility

AWIIX vs. CGJIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CIBC Atlas Income Opportunities Fund (AWIIX) is 1.60%, while Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund (CGJIX) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that AWIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGJIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWIIXCGJIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

3.38%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.02%

10.41%

-5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.53%

13.49%

-6.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.42%

19.79%

-9.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.41%

20.04%

-8.63%

AWIIX vs. CGJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWIIX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CGJIX's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

AWIIX vs. CGJIX - Dividend Comparison

AWIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.96%, more than CGJIX's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AWIIX
CIBC Atlas Income Opportunities Fund
12.96%12.46%2.45%2.27%2.27%3.80%1.77%2.30%3.15%2.37%2.83%3.22%
CGJIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Growth Responsible Index Fund
2.71%3.05%2.04%0.53%0.51%1.85%1.76%1.64%5.72%2.19%1.13%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AWIIX and CGJIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGJIX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to AWIIX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWIIX dropped -27.07% vs CGJIX's -31.18%.

CGJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWIIX and CGJIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer