AWAYX vs. APGZX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AWAYX (AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy) and APGZX (AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z) are both mutual funds - AWAYX is a Global Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while APGZX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, AWAYX returned 12.09%/yr vs 16.58%/yr for APGZX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AWAYX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for APGZX.

Performance

AWAYX vs. APGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy (AWAYX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWAYX achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly higher than APGZX's 4.85% return. Over the past 10 years, AWAYX has underperformed APGZX with an annualized return of 12.09%, while APGZX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.58% annualized return.

AWAYX

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 2.30%
• YTD: 11.56%
• 6M: 12.31%
• 1Y: 28.36%
• 3Y*: 21.11%
• 5Y*: 11.12%
• 10Y*: 12.09%

APGZX

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 2.50%
• YTD: 4.85%
• 6M: 3.93%
• 1Y: 14.65%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 11.05%
• 10Y*: 16.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWAYX vs. APGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AWAYX AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy	11.56%	21.59%	19.08%	21.06%	-18.42%	20.57%	13.04%	25.57%	-9.68%	22.02%
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z	4.85%	13.26%	25.47%	35.12%	-28.74%	29.00%	34.47%	34.24%	2.30%	31.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AWAYX and APGZX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.88

The correlation between AWAYX and APGZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AWAYX vs. APGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWAYX

AWAYX Risk / Return Rank: 59
AWAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AWAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AWAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AWAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
AWAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

APGZX

APGZX Risk / Return Rank: 14
APGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
APGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
APGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
APGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
APGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWAYX vs. APGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy (AWAYX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AWAYX	APGZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.09	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	1.58	+1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.20	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	1.03	+1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.80	3.82	+8.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AWAYX vs. APGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWAYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the APGZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWAYX and APGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AWAYX	APGZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	1.09	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.55	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.85	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.82	-0.38

Drawdowns

AWAYX vs. APGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWAYX drawdown since its inception was -60.32%, which is greater than APGZX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAYX and APGZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AWAYX	APGZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.32%	-33.87%	-26.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-15.21%	+5.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.59%	-21.57%	+3.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.40%	-33.87%	+7.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.32%	-33.87%	-0.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-1.47%	+0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.74%	-6.02%	-3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	4.09%	-1.83%

Volatility

AWAYX vs. APGZX - Volatility Comparison

AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy (AWAYX) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) at 3.32%. This indicates that AWAYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AWAYX	APGZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	3.32%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	10.93%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.26%	14.37%	-1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.14%	20.15%	-4.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.82%	19.67%	-2.85%

AWAYX vs. APGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWAYX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than APGZX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

AWAYX vs. APGZX - Dividend Comparison

AWAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.60%, less than APGZX's 9.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z	9.31%	9.77%	6.62%	1.69%	0.87%	7.19%	2.60%	3.49%	9.11%	3.78%	2.72%	0.00%
AWAYX AB Wealth Appreciation Strategy	6.60%	7.36%	5.97%	2.54%	7.90%	9.02%	3.05%	4.11%	3.94%	7.73%	6.17%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AWAYX and APGZX in my portfolio?

AWAYX and APGZX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AWAYX or APGZX?

AWAYX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to APGZX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWAYX dropped -60.32% vs APGZX's -33.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AWAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.