AWAY vs. USL
AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - AWAY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Prime Travel Technology Index, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AWAY returned -11.00%/yr vs 17.05%/yr for USL. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AWAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
AWAY vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWAY achieves a -15.47% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.
AWAY
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -1.83%
- YTD
- -15.47%
- 6M
- -16.29%
- 1Y
- -17.95%
- 3Y*
- 0.57%
- 5Y*
- -11.00%
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 60.58%
- 6M
- 56.11%
- 1Y
- 56.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 17.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
AWAY vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | -15.47% | -3.36% | 10.44% | 17.94% | -32.25% | -5.91% | 4.41% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 60.58% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | 27.10% | 62.48% | -16.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWAY and USL is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2020 | 0.17 |
The correlation between AWAY and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AWAY vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AWAY
USL
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AWAY
USL
-
Technology
AWAY
USL
-
Communication Services
AWAY
USL
-
Industrials
AWAY
USL
-
Financial Services
AWAY
USL
Basic Materials
AWAY
-
USL
-
Consumer Defensive
AWAY
-
USL
-
Energy
AWAY
-
USL
-
Healthcare
AWAY
-
USL
-
Real Estate
AWAY
-
USL
-
Utilities
AWAY
-
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWAY vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
AWAY
USL
AWAY vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AWAY | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.33 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 3.39 | -3.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 6.85 | -7.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AWAY | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 | 1.99 | -2.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.41 | 0.57 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | 0.01 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
AWAY vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWAY drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAY and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWAY | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -89.06% | +32.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.83% | -16.76% | -16.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.83% | -23.33% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.49% | -33.82% | -18.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.01% | -39.10% | -9.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.16% | -61.45% | +25.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.40% | 8.27% | +8.13% |
Volatility
AWAY vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) is 7.10%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that AWAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWAY | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.10% | 10.57% | -3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.95% | 23.34% | -5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.39% | 28.59% | -6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.83% | 30.09% | -3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.81% | 32.34% | -0.53% |
AWAY vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWAY vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
Neither AWAY nor USL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWAY and USL have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to AWAY (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWAY dropped -56.57% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.05% vs -11.00% for AWAY. On fees, AWAY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AWAY has been the lower-risk option at 7.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.05% return vs -11.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AWAY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
AWAY and USL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
AWAY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AWAY and 0.88% for USL.
USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWAY and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer