AWAY vs. IYC
AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) and IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - AWAY tracks the Prime Travel Technology Index while IYC tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AWAY returned -11.20%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for IYC. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AWAY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYC.
Performance
AWAY vs. IYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AWAY achieves a -16.40% return, which is significantly lower than IYC's -2.72% return.
AWAY
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -16.40%
- 6M
- -17.29%
- 1Y
- -18.42%
- 3Y*
- 0.30%
- 5Y*
- -11.20%
- 10Y*
- —
IYC
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- -2.72%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
AWAY vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | -16.40% | -3.36% | 10.44% | 17.94% | -32.25% | -5.91% | 4.41% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -2.72% | 7.85% | 27.54% | 34.03% | -31.78% | 19.65% | 19.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AWAY and IYC is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2020 | 0.72 |
The correlation between AWAY and IYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
AWAY vs. IYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AWAY
IYC
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AWAY
IYC
Technology
AWAY
IYC
Communication Services
AWAY
IYC
Industrials
AWAY
IYC
Financial Services
AWAY
IYC
-
Basic Materials
AWAY
-
IYC
-
Consumer Defensive
AWAY
-
IYC
Energy
AWAY
-
IYC
Healthcare
AWAY
-
IYC
-
Real Estate
AWAY
-
IYC
-
Utilities
AWAY
-
IYC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AWAY vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank
AWAY
IYC
AWAY vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AWAY | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.05 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 0.28 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 0.85 | -1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AWAY | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | 0.24 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | 0.31 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | 0.42 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
AWAY vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AWAY drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than IYC's maximum drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAY and IYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AWAY | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -53.10% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.83% | -11.97% | -20.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.83% | -21.62% | -11.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.49% | -35.90% | -16.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.57% | -6.39% | -43.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.15% | -9.95% | -26.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.33% | 3.95% | +12.38% |
Volatility
AWAY vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) at 3.97%. This indicates that AWAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AWAY | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 3.97% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.95% | 10.50% | +7.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.36% | 14.32% | +8.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.82% | 20.73% | +6.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.81% | 19.89% | +11.92% |
AWAY vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AWAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
AWAY vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison
AWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AWAY and IYC have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AWAY has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to IYC (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWAY dropped -56.57% vs IYC's -53.10%.
On 5-year performance, IYC leads with 6.29% vs -11.20% for AWAY. On fees, IYC is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IYC has performed better with a 6.29% return vs -11.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYC is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.
IYC has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.00% for AWAY.
AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AWAY and 0.38% for IYC.
IYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AWAY and IYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer