PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWAY vs. BLOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AWAY vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWAY achieves a -16.40% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 16.21% return.


AWAY

1D
-2.20%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
-16.40%
6M
-17.29%
1Y
-18.42%
3Y*
0.30%
5Y*
-11.20%
10Y*

BLOK

1D
-2.62%
1M
7.72%
YTD
16.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
30.79%
3Y*
51.34%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWAY vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AWAY
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF
-16.40%-3.36%10.44%17.94%-32.25%-5.91%4.41%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
16.21%32.64%53.12%99.62%-62.36%30.76%77.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AWAY and BLOK is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2020

0.60

The correlation between AWAY and BLOK shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AWAY vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AWAY
BLOK

Consumer Cyclical

63.7%
6.7%

Technology

30.0%
31.8%

Communication Services

4.0%
5.2%

Industrials

1.0%
1.0%

Financial Services

0.2%
55.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

AWAY
63.7%
BLOK
6.7%

Technology

AWAY
30.0%
BLOK
31.8%

Communication Services

AWAY
4.0%
BLOK
5.2%

Industrials

AWAY
1.0%
BLOK
1.0%

Financial Services

AWAY
0.2%
BLOK
55.3%

Basic Materials

AWAY

-

BLOK

-

Consumer Defensive

AWAY

-

BLOK

-

Energy

AWAY

-

BLOK

-

Healthcare

AWAY

-

BLOK

-

Real Estate

AWAY

-

BLOK
0.0%

Utilities

AWAY

-

BLOK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AWAY vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWAY
AWAY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
AWAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWAY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
AWAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWAY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWAY vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AWAYBLOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.16

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

0.87

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.13

1.90

-3.03

AWAY vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWAY and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AWAYBLOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.83

0.81

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.28

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.48

-0.66

Drawdowns

AWAY vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWAY drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWAY and BLOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AWAYBLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.57%

-73.33%

+16.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.83%

-35.64%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.83%

-35.64%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.49%

-73.33%

+20.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.57%

-10.16%

-39.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.15%

-26.08%

-10.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.33%

16.23%

+0.10%

Volatility

AWAY vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) is 7.18%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that AWAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AWAYBLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

10.59%

-3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.95%

28.55%

-10.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.36%

38.29%

-15.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.82%

42.36%

-15.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.81%

38.97%

-7.16%

AWAY vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWAY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

AWAY vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

AWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AWAY
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF
0.00%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
0.62%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


AWAY and BLOK have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLOK has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to AWAY (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWAY dropped -56.57% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

On 5-year performance, BLOK leads with 11.96% vs -11.20% for AWAY. On fees, BLOK is cheaper at 0.71% per year. On volatility, AWAY has been the lower-risk option at 7.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 11.96% return vs -11.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLOK is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.

BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for AWAY.

AWAY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while BLOK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AWAY and 0.71% for BLOK.

BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AWAY and BLOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer