PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVXC vs. VGIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVXC vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVXC achieves a 31.49% return, which is significantly higher than VGIT's -0.29% return.


AVXC

1D
0.58%
1M
5.51%
YTD
31.49%
6M
35.68%
1Y
55.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGIT

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.67%
YTD
-0.29%
6M
0.04%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVXC vs. VGIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
31.49%31.45%-1.26%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
-0.29%7.34%2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AVXC and VGIT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVXC vs. VGIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VGIT
VGIT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VGIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
VGIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVXC vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVXCVGITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.17

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

1.13

+2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.82

3.18

+11.64

AVXC vs. VGIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the VGIT Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVXC and VGIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVXC vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVXC drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, which is greater than VGIT's maximum drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVXC and VGIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVXCVGITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-16.05%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-2.83%

-11.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-2.22%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-3.52%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

1.01%

+2.60%

Volatility

AVXC vs. VGIT - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) has a higher volatility of 11.39% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) at 1.15%. This indicates that AVXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVXCVGITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.39%

1.15%

+10.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.80%

2.40%

+17.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.88%

3.34%

+18.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

5.38%

+13.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

4.50%

+14.76%

AVXC vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVXC has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVXC vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison

AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than VGIT's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
2.06%1.97%1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
3.86%3.79%3.67%2.73%1.74%1.69%2.23%2.24%2.05%1.67%1.69%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVXC and VGIT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVXC has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to VGIT (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVXC dropped -20.44% vs VGIT's -16.05%.

On 1-year performance, AVXC leads with 55.53% vs 3.43% for VGIT. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVXC has performed better with a 55.53% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVXC.

VGIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 2.06% for AVXC.

AVXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VGIT is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVXC and 0.03% for VGIT.

AVXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVXC and VGIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer