PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVXC vs. GEME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVXC vs. GEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVXC achieves a 23.53% return, which is significantly lower than GEME's 30.26% return.


AVXC

1D
1.36%
1M
-3.87%
6M
12.86%
YTD
23.53%
1Y
43.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.06%

GEME

1D
0.43%
1M
-0.52%
6M
17.23%
YTD
30.26%
1Y
61.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
46.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.49M$2.46M$3.42M
$7.17M$4.51M$3.42M

AVXC vs. GEME - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVXC and GEME is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.83

The correlation between AVXC and GEME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVXC vs. GEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GEME
GEME Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GEME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEME Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GEME Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEME Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVXC vs. GEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVXCGEMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

4.60

-1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.98

14.11

-5.13

AVXC vs. GEME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVXC Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the GEME Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVXC and GEME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVXC vs. GEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVXC drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, which is greater than GEME's maximum drawdown of -16.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVXC and GEME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVXCGEMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-16.86%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.43%

-13.46%

-2.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.40%

-7.12%

-4.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-2.73%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

4.37%

+0.43%

Volatility

AVXC vs. GEME - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) at 7.57%. This indicates that AVXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GEME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVXCGEMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.94%

7.57%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.40%

21.31%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.16%

24.16%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.61%

24.06%

-3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.61%

24.06%

-3.45%

AVXC vs. GEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVXC has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than GEME's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVXC vs. GEME - Dividend Comparison

AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than GEME's 5.38% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVXC and GEME have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVXC has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to GEME (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVXC dropped -20.44% vs GEME's -16.86%.

On 1-year performance, GEME leads with 61.53% vs 43.04% for AVXC. On fees, AVXC is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, GEME has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GEME has performed better with a 61.53% return vs 43.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVXC is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GEME.

GEME has the higher dividend yield at 5.38%, compared with 1.71% for AVXC.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Pacific AM. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVXC and 0.75% for GEME.

GEME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVXC and GEME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer