PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVXC vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVXC vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVXC achieves a 34.06% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


AVXC

1D
-1.44%
1M
10.62%
YTD
34.06%
6M
38.17%
1Y
62.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVXC vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
34.06%31.45%-0.80%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%-4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between AVXC and DBE is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024

-0.06

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between AVXC and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.06 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVXC vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVXC
AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVXC vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVXCDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.40

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

5.89

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.06

11.53

+6.53

AVXC vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVXC Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVXC and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVXCDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12

2.43

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.58

0.09

+1.48

Drawdowns

AVXC vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVXC drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVXC and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVXCDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-86.69%

+66.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-14.41%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-30.27%

+28.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-57.31%

+53.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

7.35%

-3.89%

Volatility

AVXC vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) is 9.00%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that AVXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVXCDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

12.95%

-3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.67%

30.86%

-13.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

34.97%

-14.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

29.39%

-10.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

28.33%

-9.86%

AVXC vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVXC has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVXC vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVXC
Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF
1.49%1.97%1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVXC and DBE have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to AVXC (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVXC dropped -20.44% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 84.41% vs 62.37% for AVXC. On fees, AVXC is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, AVXC has been the lower-risk option at 9.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 84.41% return vs 62.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVXC is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.49% for AVXC.

AVXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while DBE is Oil & Gas. AVXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets IMI, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Avantis Investors and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVXC and 0.78% for DBE.

AVXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVXC and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer