AVXC vs. BBEM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AVXC (Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF) and BBEM (JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. AVXC is actively managed, while BBEM is passively managed. Over the past year, AVXC returned 56.20% vs 44.01% for BBEM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVXC charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBEM.

Performance

AVXC vs. BBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVXC achieves a 31.52% return, which is significantly higher than BBEM's 21.92% return.

AVXC

• 1D: -5.67%
• 1M: 3.81%
• YTD: 31.52%
• 6M: 32.82%
• 1Y: 56.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBEM

• 1D: -5.86%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 21.92%
• 6M: 22.38%
• 1Y: 44.01%
• 3Y*: 21.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVXC vs. BBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF	31.52%	31.45%	-1.26%
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	21.92%	32.43%	3.85%

Correlation

The correlation between AVXC and BBEM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	0.89

The correlation between AVXC and BBEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AVXC vs. BBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVXC

AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 80
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 82

BBEM

BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 67
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVXC vs. BBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVXC	BBEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	1.98	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.57	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.38	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	3.37	+0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.56	12.56	+3.00

AVXC vs. BBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the BBEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVXC and BBEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVXC vs. BBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVXC drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, which is greater than BBEM's maximum drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVXC and BBEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVXC	BBEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.44%	-17.42%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.04%	-13.12%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.67%	-5.86%	+0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-3.71%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	3.51%	+0.11%

Volatility

AVXC vs. BBEM - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) and JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) have volatilities of 13.12% and 12.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVXC	BBEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.12%	12.60%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.15%	20.54%	+0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.03%	22.39%	+0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.83%	18.48%	+1.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.83%	18.48%	+1.35%

AVXC vs. BBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVXC has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVXC vs. BBEM - Dividend Comparison

AVXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than BBEM's 4.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF	2.06%	1.97%	1.34%	0.00%
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	4.78%	5.86%	2.73%	1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVXC and BBEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, AVXC and BBEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AVXC or BBEM?

AVXC has higher volatility (13.12%) compared to BBEM (12.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVXC dropped -20.44% vs BBEM's -17.42%.

Which ETF is better, AVXC or BBEM?

On 1-year performance, AVXC leads with 56.20% vs 44.01% for BBEM. On fees, BBEM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBEM has been the lower-risk option at 12.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVXC or BBEM?

Over the 1-year period, AVXC has performed better with a 56.20% return vs 44.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVXC or BBEM?

BBEM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVXC or BBEM?

BBEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 2.06% for AVXC.

What is the main difference between AVXC and BBEM?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVXC and 0.15% for BBEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.