AVUV vs. SLYG
AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) and SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while SLYG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. AVUV is actively managed, while SLYG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUV returned 11.57%/yr vs 6.11%/yr for SLYG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVUV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYG.
Performance
AVUV vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUV achieves a 22.73% return, which is significantly higher than SLYG's 20.04% return.
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 22.73%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 40.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SLYG
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 20.04%
- 6M
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 29.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
AVUV vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 22.73% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.54% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 20.04% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 6.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUV and SLYG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between AVUV and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVUV vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUV
SLYG
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
AVUV
SLYG
Energy
AVUV
SLYG
Consumer Cyclical
AVUV
SLYG
Industrials
AVUV
SLYG
Technology
AVUV
SLYG
Basic Materials
AVUV
SLYG
Consumer Defensive
AVUV
SLYG
Healthcare
AVUV
SLYG
Communication Services
AVUV
SLYG
Real Estate
AVUV
SLYG
Utilities
AVUV
SLYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUV vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank
AVUV
SLYG
AVUV vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVUV | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.29 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 3.29 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.09 | 11.60 | +3.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVUV vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUV drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUV and SLYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUV | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.42% | -62.92% | +13.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -9.10% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.79% | -27.39% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.79% | -29.18% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.91% | -14.90% | +6.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 2.59% | +0.08% |
Volatility
AVUV vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) is 4.53%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that AVUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUV | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 5.57% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 12.91% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 17.93% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 21.56% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.26% | 22.76% | +5.50% |
AVUV vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVUV vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison
AVUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than SLYG's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.61% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.68% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, AVUV and SLYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SLYG has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to AVUV (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUV dropped -49.42% vs SLYG's -62.92%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 11.57% vs 6.11% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 11.57% return vs 6.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.68% for SLYG.
AVUV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SLYG is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVUV and 0.15% for SLYG.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUV and SLYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer