PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVUS vs. QGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVUS vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVUS achieves a 15.06% return, which is significantly higher than QGRO's 2.33% return.


AVUS

1D
0.56%
1M
4.25%
YTD
15.06%
6M
15.18%
1Y
33.34%
3Y*
22.76%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*

QGRO

1D
0.14%
1M
3.95%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.50%
1Y
10.57%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUS vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
15.06%16.68%20.43%21.77%-13.82%28.73%17.58%8.87%
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
2.33%15.18%31.42%32.42%-24.54%24.57%37.99%9.24%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUS and QGRO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.86

The correlation between AVUS and QGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVUS vs. QGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVUS
QGRO

Technology

27.5%
37.1%

Financial Services

15.2%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
12.0%

Industrials

11.5%
13.6%

Communication Services

9.8%
11.0%

Energy

7.4%
1.8%

Healthcare

7.1%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
3.8%

Basic Materials

2.7%
0.3%

Utilities

2.5%
0.9%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.9%

Technology

AVUS
27.5%
QGRO
37.1%

Financial Services

AVUS
15.2%
QGRO
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

AVUS
11.8%
QGRO
12.0%

Industrials

AVUS
11.5%
QGRO
13.6%

Communication Services

AVUS
9.8%
QGRO
11.0%

Energy

AVUS
7.4%
QGRO
1.8%

Healthcare

AVUS
7.1%
QGRO
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

AVUS
4.4%
QGRO
3.8%

Basic Materials

AVUS
2.7%
QGRO
0.3%

Utilities

AVUS
2.5%
QGRO
0.9%

Real Estate

AVUS
0.2%
QGRO
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVUS vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUS
AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRO
QGRO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUS vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVUSQGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.12

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

0.78

+3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.43

2.63

+16.80

AVUS vs. QGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the QGRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUS and QGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVUSQGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

0.69

+2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.58

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.67

+0.13

Drawdowns

AVUS vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUS drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than QGRO's maximum drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUS and QGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVUSQGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-32.56%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-13.54%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.74%

-23.82%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-31.86%

+9.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.53%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-7.67%

+2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

4.03%

-2.31%

Volatility

AVUS vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) is 2.87%, while American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that AVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVUSQGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

3.37%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.01%

11.70%

-2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

15.32%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

21.05%

-3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

22.92%

-2.08%

AVUS vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVUS vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison

AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than QGRO's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
0.90%1.08%1.27%1.41%1.59%1.08%1.19%0.35%0.00%
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
0.19%0.25%0.25%0.41%0.46%0.31%0.22%0.38%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVUS and QGRO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QGRO has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to AVUS (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUS dropped -37.04% vs QGRO's -32.56%.

On 5-year performance, AVUS leads with 13.16% vs 12.25% for QGRO. On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 13.16% return vs 12.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.

AVUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.

AVUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUS and 0.29% for QGRO.

AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVUS and QGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer