AVUS vs. OILK
AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. AVUS is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUS returned 13.29%/yr vs 17.52%/yr for OILK. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
AVUS vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUS achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.95% return.
AVUS
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 34.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 61.95%
- 6M
- 59.31%
- 1Y
- 57.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUS vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 14.95% | 16.68% | 20.43% | 21.77% | -13.82% | 28.73% | 17.58% | 8.87% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 61.95% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 8.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUS and OILK is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.22 |
The correlation between AVUS and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AVUS vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUS
OILK
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
AVUS
OILK
-
Financial Services
AVUS
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
AVUS
OILK
Industrials
AVUS
OILK
-
Communication Services
AVUS
OILK
-
Energy
AVUS
OILK
-
Healthcare
AVUS
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
AVUS
OILK
-
Basic Materials
AVUS
OILK
-
Utilities
AVUS
OILK
-
Real Estate
AVUS
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUS vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
AVUS
OILK
AVUS vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.82 | 2.03 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.83 | 2.55 | +1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.34 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 3.61 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.10 | 7.33 | +12.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 2.03 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.59 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.11 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
AVUS vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUS drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUS and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -83.76% | +46.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -17.35% | +9.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.74% | -23.42% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | -34.69% | +12.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.99% | +4.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -32.62% | +27.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 8.56% | -6.84% |
Volatility
AVUS vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) is 2.97%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that AVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 11.11% | -8.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.99% | 23.24% | -14.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 28.86% | -16.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 30.11% | -12.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 35.98% | -15.13% |
AVUS vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVUS vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than OILK's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.29% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVUS and OILK have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to AVUS (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUS dropped -37.04% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.52% vs 13.29% for AVUS. On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.52% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 0.90% for AVUS.
AVUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: American Century and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUS and 0.68% for OILK.
AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUS and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer