PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVUS vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVUS vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AVUS having a 14.06% return and DGRO slightly lower at 13.71%.


AVUS

1D
1.68%
1M
-0.94%
6M
9.63%
YTD
14.06%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.02%

DGRO

1D
-0.05%
1M
3.22%
6M
10.16%
YTD
13.71%
1Y
22.44%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
13.41%
ALL TIME*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.04M$39.21M$43.08M
$102.68M$104.57M$110.25M

AVUS vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
14.06%16.68%20.43%21.77%-13.82%28.73%17.58%8.55%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
13.71%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%8.23%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUS and DGRO is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between AVUS and DGRO has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AVUS vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVUS
DGRO

Technology

29.3%
17.3%

Financial Services

16.2%
20.4%

Industrials

11.1%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
6.5%

Communication Services

8.5%
0.1%

Healthcare

7.3%
17.9%

Energy

7.1%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
11.9%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.5%

Utilities

2.4%
7.3%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

AVUS
29.3%
DGRO
17.3%

Financial Services

AVUS
16.2%
DGRO
20.4%

Industrials

AVUS
11.1%
DGRO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AVUS
11.0%
DGRO
6.5%

Communication Services

AVUS
8.5%
DGRO
0.1%

Healthcare

AVUS
7.3%
DGRO
17.9%

Energy

AVUS
7.1%
DGRO
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

AVUS
4.4%
DGRO
11.9%

Basic Materials

AVUS
2.7%
DGRO
2.5%

Utilities

AVUS
2.4%
DGRO
7.3%

Real Estate

AVUS
0.1%
DGRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVUS vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVUS
AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVUS vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVUSDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.48

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.47

13.60

-0.13

AVUS vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUS and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVUS vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUS drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUS and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVUSDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-35.10%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-6.47%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.74%

-14.03%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-19.31%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.07%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-3.41%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.66%

+0.12%

Volatility

AVUS vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVUSDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

3.20%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

7.11%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

9.62%

+3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

13.80%

+3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

16.58%

+4.14%

AVUS vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVUS vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than DGRO's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
0.93%1.08%1.27%1.41%1.59%1.08%1.19%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.89%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVUS and DGRO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVUS has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to DGRO (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUS dropped -37.04% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 5-year performance, AVUS leads with 12.64% vs 11.14% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 11.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVUS.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.93% for AVUS.

AVUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUS and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVUS and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer