AVUS vs. BBUS
AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while BBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. AVUS is actively managed, while BBUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVUS returned 13.04%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AVUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
AVUS vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVUS achieves a 14.42% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.
AVUS
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 32.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUS vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 14.42% | 16.68% | 20.43% | 21.77% | -13.82% | 28.73% | 17.58% | 8.87% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVUS and BBUS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between AVUS and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVUS vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVUS
BBUS
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVUS
BBUS
Financial Services
AVUS
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
AVUS
BBUS
Industrials
AVUS
BBUS
Communication Services
AVUS
BBUS
Energy
AVUS
BBUS
Healthcare
AVUS
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
AVUS
BBUS
Basic Materials
AVUS
BBUS
Utilities
AVUS
BBUS
Real Estate
AVUS
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVUS vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
AVUS
BBUS
AVUS vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVUS | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.42 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 3.00 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.85 | 13.76 | +5.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVUS | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 2.33 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.79 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.84 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
AVUS vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVUS drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUS and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVUS | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -35.35% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.85% | -9.21% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.74% | -19.01% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | -25.46% | +3.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.74% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -5.46% | +0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 2.00% | -0.28% |
Volatility
AVUS vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 2.98% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVUS | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 2.88% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 8.96% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 11.87% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 17.03% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 19.59% | +1.26% |
AVUS vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVUS vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
AVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 0.91% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, AVUS and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVUS has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUS dropped -37.04% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 13.04% for AVUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 13.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVUS.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.91% for AVUS.
AVUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUS and 0.02% for BBUS.
AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVUS and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer