PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVUQ vs. NFXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVUQ vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVUQ achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 24.21% return.


AVUQ

1D
-1.77%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
7.35%
6M
6.08%
1Y
24.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFXS

1D
0.09%
1M
21.28%
YTD
24.21%
6M
24.00%
1Y
64.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUQ vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AVUQ
Avantis U.S. Quality ETF
7.35%21.84%
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
24.21%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUQ and NFXS is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVUQ vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUQ
AVUQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AVUQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

NFXS
NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUQ vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVUQNFXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.06

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.13

5.64

+2.49

AVUQ vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUQ and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVUQ vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUQ drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum NFXS drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUQ and NFXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVUQNFXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-50.37%

+38.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.61%

-31.31%

+19.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.42%

-12.88%

+8.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-31.93%

+29.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

11.45%

-8.43%

Volatility

AVUQ vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) is 5.97%, while Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) has a volatility of 7.74%. This indicates that AVUQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVUQNFXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

7.74%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

26.22%

-13.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.14%

33.81%

-17.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

34.65%

-14.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

34.65%

-14.98%

AVUQ vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVUQ vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

AVUQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than NFXS's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AVUQ
Avantis U.S. Quality ETF
0.46%0.32%0.00%
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
3.23%3.53%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVUQ and NFXS have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFXS has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to AVUQ (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUQ dropped -12.35% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 64.26% vs 24.50% for AVUQ. On fees, AVUQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 64.26% return vs 24.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.46% for AVUQ.

AVUQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUQ and 1.03% for NFXS.

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVUQ and NFXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer