PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVUQ vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVUQ vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVUQ achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 31.75% return.


AVUQ

1D
-0.95%
1M
4.87%
YTD
11.23%
6M
11.01%
1Y
30.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMTM

1D
0.50%
1M
6.28%
YTD
31.75%
6M
34.74%
1Y
63.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVUQ vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AVUQ
Avantis U.S. Quality ETF
11.23%22.52%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
31.75%25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between AVUQ and FMTM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.70

The correlation between AVUQ and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVUQ vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVUQ
AVUQ Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
AVUQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVUQ vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVUQFMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.46

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

5.28

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.45

20.62

-10.17

AVUQ vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVUQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVUQ and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVUQFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.80

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

2.38

-0.83

Drawdowns

AVUQ vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVUQ drawdown since its inception was -11.86%, roughly equal to the maximum FMTM drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVUQ and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVUQFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.86%

-12.12%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.61%

-12.12%

+0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

0.00%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-1.89%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

3.10%

-0.18%

Volatility

AVUQ vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Quality ETF (AVUQ) is 3.61%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that AVUQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVUQFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

6.52%

-2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

17.83%

-6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

22.82%

-7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.42%

22.94%

-3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.42%

22.94%

-3.52%

AVUQ vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVUQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVUQ vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

AVUQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than FMTM's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AVUQ
Avantis U.S. Quality ETF
0.35%0.32%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.22%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVUQ and FMTM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to AVUQ (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVUQ dropped -11.86% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.62% vs 30.44% for AVUQ. On fees, AVUQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.62% return vs 30.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FMTM.

AVUQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.

AVUQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVUQ and 0.45% for FMTM.

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVUQ and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer