AVTM vs. SPGM
AVTM (Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF) and SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AVTM is actively managed, while SPGM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVTM charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPGM.
Performance
AVTM vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVTM
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPGM
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 31.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
AVTM vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 9.06% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 8.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVTM and SPGM is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.95 |
AVTM vs. SPGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVTM
SPGM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVTM
SPGM
Financial Services
AVTM
SPGM
Industrials
AVTM
SPGM
Consumer Cyclical
AVTM
SPGM
Communication Services
AVTM
SPGM
Healthcare
AVTM
SPGM
Energy
AVTM
SPGM
Consumer Defensive
AVTM
SPGM
Basic Materials
AVTM
SPGM
Utilities
AVTM
SPGM
Real Estate
AVTM
SPGM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVTM vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank
AVTM
SPGM
AVTM vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVTM | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.88 | 0.66 | +1.23 |
Drawdowns
AVTM vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVTM drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum SPGM drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVTM and SPGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVTM | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -33.97% | +24.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.87% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -4.81% | +2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
AVTM vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVTM | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.88% | 12.88% | +3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 16.03% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 17.57% | -1.69% |
AVTM vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVTM has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVTM vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison
AVTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than SPGM's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, AVTM and SPGM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for AVTM.
SPGM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.08% for AVTM.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for AVTM and 0.09% for SPGM.
Find the right allocation for AVTM and SPGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer