PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVTM vs. IDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVTM vs. IDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AVTM

1D
-0.65%
1M
5.45%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IDV

1D
-1.09%
1M
0.90%
YTD
12.32%
6M
15.21%
1Y
36.98%
3Y*
25.10%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVTM vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVTM and IDV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

0.67

AVTM vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVTM
IDV

Technology

31.0%
0.9%

Financial Services

16.6%
30.1%

Industrials

11.9%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
9.6%

Communication Services

10.2%
10.0%

Healthcare

6.4%

-

Energy

4.2%
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
7.2%

Basic Materials

2.7%
5.8%

Utilities

1.8%
11.8%

Real Estate

0.2%
2.4%

Technology

AVTM
31.0%
IDV
0.9%

Financial Services

AVTM
16.6%
IDV
30.1%

Industrials

AVTM
11.9%
IDV
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

AVTM
11.0%
IDV
9.6%

Communication Services

AVTM
10.2%
IDV
10.0%

Healthcare

AVTM
6.4%
IDV

-

Energy

AVTM
4.2%
IDV
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

AVTM
4.2%
IDV
7.2%

Basic Materials

AVTM
2.7%
IDV
5.8%

Utilities

AVTM
1.8%
IDV
11.8%

Real Estate

AVTM
0.2%
IDV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVTM vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVTM

IDV
IDV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVTM vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AVTM vs. IDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVTMIDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.88

0.22

+1.67

Drawdowns

AVTM vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVTM drawdown since its inception was -9.21%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVTM and IDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVTMIDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-70.14%

+60.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-2.80%

+2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-15.40%

+13.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

Volatility

AVTM vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVTMIDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

12.85%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

15.54%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

17.94%

-2.06%

AVTM vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVTM has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVTM vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison

AVTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than IDV's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVTM
Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF
0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
4.45%4.94%6.46%6.51%7.33%5.78%5.47%5.15%5.93%4.52%4.69%5.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVTM and IDV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVTM is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVTM is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.

IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 0.08% for AVTM.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for AVTM and 0.49% for IDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVTM and IDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer