AVSC vs. SLYV
AVSC (Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF) and SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - AVSC tracks the Russell 2000 Index while SLYV tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVSC returned 17.09%/yr vs 14.08%/yr for SLYV. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AVSC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYV.
Performance
AVSC vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVSC achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than SLYV's 15.25% return.
AVSC
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 38.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLYV
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
AVSC vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVSC Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF | 16.85% | 9.42% | 7.75% | 19.68% | -11.72% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 15.25% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -12.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVSC and SLYV is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between AVSC and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVSC vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVSC
SLYV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
AVSC
SLYV
Consumer Cyclical
AVSC
SLYV
Industrials
AVSC
SLYV
Technology
AVSC
SLYV
Healthcare
AVSC
SLYV
Energy
AVSC
SLYV
Basic Materials
AVSC
SLYV
Consumer Defensive
AVSC
SLYV
Communication Services
AVSC
SLYV
Utilities
AVSC
SLYV
Real Estate
AVSC
SLYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVSC vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank
AVSC
SLYV
AVSC vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVSC | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.93 | 3.97 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.33 | 13.09 | +2.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVSC | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.05 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.46 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
AVSC vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVSC drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, smaller than the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVSC and SLYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVSC | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.40% | -61.15% | +32.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -9.36% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -28.68% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -1.18% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -8.94% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 2.83% | -0.29% |
Volatility
AVSC vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison
Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVSC | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 4.42% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 11.46% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 18.26% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 21.96% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 23.96% | -1.62% |
AVSC vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVSC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVSC vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison
AVSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than SLYV's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVSC Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, AVSC and SLYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVSC has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to SLYV (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVSC dropped -28.40% vs SLYV's -61.15%.
On 3-year performance, AVSC leads with 17.09% vs 14.08% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVSC has performed better with a 17.09% return vs 14.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVSC.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.92% for AVSC.
AVSC tracks Russell 2000 Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVSC and 0.15% for SLYV.
AVSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVSC and SLYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer