PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVSC vs. RZV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVSC vs. RZV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AVSC having a 22.59% return and RZV slightly lower at 22.56%.


AVSC

1D
1.19%
1M
5.61%
YTD
22.59%
6M
20.01%
1Y
41.77%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
10Y*

RZV

1D
1.27%
1M
6.80%
YTD
22.56%
6M
21.05%
1Y
41.93%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVSC vs. RZV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AVSC
Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF
22.59%9.42%7.75%19.68%-12.40%
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
22.56%8.65%5.06%22.97%-8.64%

Correlation

The correlation between AVSC and RZV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022

0.94

The correlation between AVSC and RZV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVSC vs. RZV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVSC
AVSC Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AVSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVSC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AVSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

RZV
RZV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RZV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RZV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVSC vs. RZV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVSCRZVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.34

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.32

3.35

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.66

10.89

+5.77

AVSC vs. RZV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the RZV Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVSC and RZV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVSC vs. RZV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVSC drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, smaller than the maximum RZV drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVSC and RZV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVSCRZVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.40%

-77.11%

+48.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-12.56%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.40%

-29.81%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.83%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-13.57%

+6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

3.86%

-1.35%

Volatility

AVSC vs. RZV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC) is 4.76%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that AVSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RZV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVSCRZVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

5.22%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

14.12%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

20.76%

-2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.28%

24.32%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.28%

26.99%

-4.71%

AVSC vs. RZV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVSC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RZV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVSC vs. RZV - Dividend Comparison

AVSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than RZV's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVSC
Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF
0.94%1.16%1.17%1.42%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RZV
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF
1.44%1.59%1.14%1.13%1.43%0.86%0.63%1.03%2.03%1.02%0.46%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AVSC and RZV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RZV has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to AVSC (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVSC dropped -28.40% vs RZV's -77.11%.

On 3-year performance, RZV leads with 19.27% vs 19.17% for AVSC. On fees, AVSC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RZV has performed better with a 19.27% return vs 19.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVSC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZV.

RZV has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.94% for AVSC.

AVSC tracks Russell 2000 Index, while RZV tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVSC and 0.35% for RZV.

AVSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVSC and RZV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer