AVS vs. AIFD
AVS (Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares) and AIFD (TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while AIFD is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVS returned -40.93% vs 73.62% for AIFD. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions. AVS charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIFD.
Performance
AVS vs. AIFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVS achieves a -16.68% return, which is significantly lower than AIFD's 38.09% return.
AVS
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- -16.68%
- 6M
- -15.57%
- 1Y
- -40.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIFD
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 38.09%
- 6M
- 36.03%
- 1Y
- 73.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVS vs. AIFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AVS Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares | -16.68% | -45.96% | -27.15% |
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF | 38.09% | 28.30% | 6.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVS and AIFD is -0.75, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024 | -0.76 |
The correlation between AVS and AIFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.76 to -0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVS vs. AIFD — Risk / Return Rank
AVS
AIFD
AVS vs. AIFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVS | AIFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.42 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 6.30 | -7.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 22.79 | -24.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVS vs. AIFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVS drawdown since its inception was -76.77%, which is greater than AIFD's maximum drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVS and AIFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVS | AIFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.77% | -33.20% | -43.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.29% | -11.75% | -39.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.72% | -9.42% | -62.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.51% | -5.74% | -43.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.24% | 3.24% | +26.00% |
Volatility
AVS vs. AIFD - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) has a higher volatility of 20.67% compared to TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) at 13.46%. This indicates that AVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVS | AIFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.67% | 13.46% | +7.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.02% | 22.09% | +10.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.66% | 27.78% | +18.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.05% | 29.98% | +24.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.05% | 29.98% | +24.07% |
AVS vs. AIFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVS has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than AIFD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVS vs. AIFD - Dividend Comparison
AVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, while AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AVS Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares | 3.48% | 4.22% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVS and AIFD have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVS has higher volatility (20.67%) compared to AIFD (13.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVS dropped -76.77% vs AIFD's -33.20%.
On 1-year performance, AIFD leads with 73.62% vs -40.93% for AVS. On fees, AIFD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AIFD has been the lower-risk option at 13.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AIFD has performed better with a 73.62% return vs -40.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIFD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for AVS.
AVS has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.
AVS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AIFD is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for AVS and 0.75% for AIFD.
AIFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVS and AIFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer