AVOS vs. SPGM
AVOS (Avos Global Equities ETF) and SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AVOS is actively managed, while SPGM is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AVOS charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPGM.
Performance
AVOS vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVOS
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPGM
- 1D
- -3.08%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 10.02%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
AVOS vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | 6.70% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVOS and SPGM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026 | 0.96 |
AVOS vs. SPGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVOS
SPGM
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
AVOS
SPGM
Technology
AVOS
SPGM
Industrials
AVOS
SPGM
Energy
AVOS
SPGM
Basic Materials
AVOS
SPGM
Consumer Cyclical
AVOS
SPGM
Healthcare
AVOS
SPGM
Consumer Defensive
AVOS
SPGM
Communication Services
AVOS
SPGM
Utilities
AVOS
SPGM
Real Estate
AVOS
SPGM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVOS vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank
AVOS
SPGM
AVOS vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVOS | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.65 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
AVOS vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVOS drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum SPGM drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVOS and SPGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVOS | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -33.97% | +29.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -3.37% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -4.80% | +3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.11% | — |
Volatility
AVOS vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVOS | SPGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.54% | 13.27% | +6.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 16.08% | +3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 17.60% | +1.94% |
AVOS vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVOS has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVOS vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison
AVOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF | 1.84% | 1.89% | 1.98% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 1.94% | 1.45% | 2.46% | 1.89% | 2.29% | 1.87% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, AVOS and SPGM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for AVOS.
SPGM has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.00% for AVOS.
They also come from different issuers: Avos and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AVOS and 0.09% for SPGM.
Find the right allocation for AVOS and SPGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer