PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVOS vs. INKM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVOS vs. INKM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AVOS

1D
-2.67%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INKM

1D
-0.77%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
5.19%
6M
5.59%
1Y
12.30%
3Y*
9.76%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
5.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVOS vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVOS and INKM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026

0.82

AVOS vs. INKM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVOS
INKM

Financial Services

19.7%
8.3%

Technology

18.8%
13.2%

Industrials

11.9%
14.6%

Energy

11.4%
11.1%

Basic Materials

8.8%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
5.1%

Healthcare

6.8%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
8.6%

Communication Services

5.1%
6.2%

Utilities

3.2%
13.9%

Real Estate

2.1%
10.9%

Financial Services

AVOS
19.7%
INKM
8.3%

Technology

AVOS
18.8%
INKM
13.2%

Industrials

AVOS
11.9%
INKM
14.6%

Energy

AVOS
11.4%
INKM
11.1%

Basic Materials

AVOS
8.8%
INKM
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

AVOS
7.0%
INKM
5.1%

Healthcare

AVOS
6.8%
INKM
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

AVOS
5.3%
INKM
8.6%

Communication Services

AVOS
5.1%
INKM
6.2%

Utilities

AVOS
3.2%
INKM
13.9%

Real Estate

AVOS
2.1%
INKM
10.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVOS vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVOS

INKM
INKM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVOS vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AVOS vs. INKM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVOSINKMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.57

+0.96

Drawdowns

AVOS vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVOS drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum INKM drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVOS and INKM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVOSINKMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-28.58%

+23.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-0.77%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.33%

-3.69%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

Volatility

AVOS vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVOSINKMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.54%

6.00%

+13.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.54%

8.30%

+11.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.54%

9.78%

+9.76%

AVOS vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVOS has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVOS vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison

AVOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVOS
Avos Global Equities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
4.88%5.82%4.83%4.56%5.03%3.74%3.88%4.38%4.08%3.10%3.39%3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVOS and INKM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, INKM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INKM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for AVOS.

INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 0.00% for AVOS.

They also come from different issuers: Avos and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AVOS and 0.50% for INKM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVOS and INKM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer