AVOS vs. INKM
AVOS (Avos Global Equities ETF) and INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVOS charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for INKM.
Performance
AVOS vs. INKM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVOS
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INKM
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 5.19%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 12.30%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- 5.49%
AVOS vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | 6.70% |
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 1.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVOS and INKM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026 | 0.82 |
AVOS vs. INKM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVOS
INKM
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
AVOS
INKM
Technology
AVOS
INKM
Industrials
AVOS
INKM
Energy
AVOS
INKM
Basic Materials
AVOS
INKM
Consumer Cyclical
AVOS
INKM
Healthcare
AVOS
INKM
Consumer Defensive
AVOS
INKM
Communication Services
AVOS
INKM
Utilities
AVOS
INKM
Real Estate
AVOS
INKM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVOS vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank
AVOS
INKM
AVOS vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVOS | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.57 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
AVOS vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVOS drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum INKM drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVOS and INKM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVOS | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -28.58% | +23.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -0.77% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -3.69% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.15% | — |
Volatility
AVOS vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVOS | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.54% | 6.00% | +13.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 8.30% | +11.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 9.78% | +9.76% |
AVOS vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVOS has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVOS vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison
AVOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 4.88% | 5.82% | 4.83% | 4.56% | 5.03% | 3.74% | 3.88% | 4.38% | 4.08% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 3.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVOS and INKM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INKM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INKM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for AVOS.
INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 0.00% for AVOS.
They also come from different issuers: Avos and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AVOS and 0.50% for INKM.
Find the right allocation for AVOS and INKM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer