AVOS vs. GVAL
AVOS (Avos Global Equities ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.64% expense ratio.
Performance
AVOS vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVOS
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GVAL
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 11.26%
- YTD
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 36.41%
- 3Y*
- 25.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
AVOS vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | 8.70% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 11.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVOS and GVAL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.88 |
AVOS vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVOS
GVAL
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVOS
GVAL
Financial Services
AVOS
GVAL
Industrials
AVOS
GVAL
Healthcare
AVOS
GVAL
-
Communication Services
AVOS
GVAL
Consumer Cyclical
AVOS
GVAL
Energy
AVOS
GVAL
Basic Materials
AVOS
GVAL
Consumer Defensive
AVOS
GVAL
Utilities
AVOS
GVAL
Real Estate
AVOS
GVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVOS vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
AVOS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GVAL
AVOS vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVOS | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVOS vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVOS drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVOS and GVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVOS | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -46.82% | +42.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -2.09% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -13.76% | +12.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility
AVOS vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVOS | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.62% | 15.73% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 18.61% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 18.97% | -1.35% |
AVOS vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AVOS and GVAL have an expense ratio of 0.64%.
Dividends
AVOS vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
AVOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.43% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVOS and GVAL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.64% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVOS and GVAL have the same expense ratio: 0.64% per year.
GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 0.00% for AVOS.
They also come from different issuers: Avos and Cambria.
Find the right allocation for AVOS and GVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer