PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVON.L vs. BAB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVON.L vs. BAB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Avon Protection plc (AVON.L) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVON.L achieves a -7.92% return, which is significantly higher than BAB.L's -16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, AVON.L has outperformed BAB.L with an annualized return of 8.23%, while BAB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.80% annualized return.


AVON.L

1D
0.24%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
-7.92%
6M
-8.53%
1Y
-6.65%
3Y*
23.82%
5Y*
-8.83%
10Y*
8.23%

BAB.L

1D
0.68%
1M
-5.20%
YTD
-16.45%
6M
-9.46%
1Y
-1.91%
3Y*
50.49%
5Y*
28.47%
10Y*
1.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVON.L vs. BAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVON.L
Avon Protection plc
-7.92%24.82%76.14%-17.64%-1.14%-64.25%52.60%69.35%3.63%18.33%
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
-16.45%150.05%27.98%40.56%-11.42%13.83%-55.53%36.99%-27.77%-23.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AVON.L and BAB.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1993

0.11

Over the past year, AVON.L and BAB.L have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AVON.L:

£508.82M

BAB.L:

£5.32B

EPS

AVON.L:

£0.71

BAB.L:

£0.94

PE Ratio

AVON.L:

23.36

BAB.L:

11.10

PS Ratio

AVON.L:

0.89

BAB.L:

0.56

PB Ratio

AVON.L:

2.87

BAB.L:

7.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVON.L:

£570.26M

BAB.L:

£9.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVON.L:

£232.67M

BAB.L:

£699.70M

EBITDA (TTM)

AVON.L:

£76.45M

BAB.L:

£961.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVON.L vs. BAB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVON.L
AVON.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AVON.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVON.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVON.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
AVON.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVON.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BAB.L
BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVON.L vs. BAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avon Protection plc (AVON.L) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVON.LBAB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.02

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

-0.05

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.46

-0.14

-0.32

AVON.L vs. BAB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVON.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the BAB.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVON.L and BAB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVON.LBAB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

-0.05

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.85

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.05

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.24

-0.03

Drawdowns

AVON.L vs. BAB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVON.L drawdown since its inception was -94.03%, which is greater than BAB.L's maximum drawdown of -81.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVON.L and BAB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVON.LBAB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.03%

-81.10%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.58%

-36.28%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.28%

-36.28%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.41%

-36.28%

-42.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.10%

-79.18%

-6.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.67%

-30.86%

-28.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.23%

-35.12%

-8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.40%

13.77%

+0.63%

Volatility

AVON.L vs. BAB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avon Protection plc (AVON.L) is 10.76%, while Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) has a volatility of 12.15%. This indicates that AVON.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVON.LBAB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.76%

12.15%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.44%

25.85%

-5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.36%

35.57%

-8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.77%

33.61%

+15.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.35%

36.38%

+5.97%

Dividends

AVON.L vs. BAB.L - Dividend Comparison

AVON.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than BAB.L's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVON.L
Avon Protection plc
1.09%1.03%1.21%4.29%3.20%2.53%0.72%0.84%1.08%0.86%0.77%0.62%
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
0.67%0.56%1.06%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%6.08%4.04%2.75%2.38%

Financials

AVON.L vs. BAB.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Avon Protection plc and Babcock International Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
158.42M
2.54B
(AVON.L) Total Revenue
(BAB.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

AVON.L vs. BAB.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Avon Protection plc and Babcock International Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
38.7%
9.2%
Portfolio components
AVON.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avon Protection plc reported a gross profit of 61.28M and revenue of 158.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

BAB.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a gross profit of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.

AVON.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avon Protection plc reported an operating income of 21.28M and revenue of 158.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

BAB.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported an operating income of 234.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

AVON.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avon Protection plc reported a net income of 10.15M and revenue of 158.42M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.

BAB.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock International Group plc reported a net income of 169.30M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVON.L and BAB.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVON.L and BAB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer