AVNV vs. RODM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AVNV (Avantis All International Markets Value ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. AVNV is actively managed, while RODM is passively managed. Over the past year, AVNV returned 37.29% vs 25.72% for RODM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVNV charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.

Performance

AVNV vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVNV achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than RODM's 10.94% return.

AVNV

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.54%
• YTD: 14.75%
• 6M: 14.98%
• 1Y: 37.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RODM

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -1.11%
• YTD: 10.94%
• 6M: 11.39%
• 1Y: 25.72%
• 3Y*: 20.45%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: 9.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVNV vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVNV Avantis All International Markets Value ETF	14.75%	39.93%	5.43%	9.65%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	10.94%	34.42%	8.02%	7.30%

Correlation

The correlation between AVNV and RODM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.90

The correlation between AVNV and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVNV vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVNV	RODM
Financial Services	23.2%	26.6%
Industrials	18.1%	16.7%
Basic Materials	13.8%	6.4%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	6.0%
Technology	10.4%	10.5%
Energy	9.6%	6.3%
Communication Services	4.3%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	4.0%
Healthcare	3.2%	9.0%
Real Estate	1.4%	3.5%
Utilities	1.3%	4.8%

Return for Risk

AVNV vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVNV

AVNV Risk / Return Rank: 74
AVNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AVNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AVNV Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AVNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
AVNV Martin Ratio Rank: 68

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 77
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVNV vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVNV	RODM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.37	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.32	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.43	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	3.64	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.27	14.43	-2.16

AVNV vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVNV Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVNV and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVNV vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVNV drawdown since its inception was -13.89%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNV and RODM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVNV	RODM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.89%	-35.98%	+22.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.66%	-7.10%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-1.47%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.49%	-6.36%	+3.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	1.79%	+1.26%

Volatility

AVNV vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.15%. This indicates that AVNV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVNV	RODM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	3.15%	+2.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.33%	8.76%	+4.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	10.94%	+4.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.99%	13.45%	+1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.99%	15.19%	-0.20%

AVNV vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVNV has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVNV vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

AVNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than RODM's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVNV Avantis All International Markets Value ETF	3.89%	3.14%	3.51%	1.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.80%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVNV and RODM in my portfolio?

AVNV and RODM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVNV or RODM?

AVNV has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to RODM (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNV dropped -13.89% vs RODM's -35.98%.

Which ETF is better, AVNV or RODM?

On 1-year performance, AVNV leads with 37.29% vs 25.72% for RODM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVNV or RODM?

Over the 1-year period, AVNV has performed better with a 37.29% return vs 25.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVNV or RODM?

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for AVNV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVNV or RODM?

AVNV has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 2.80% for RODM.

What is the main difference between AVNV and RODM?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for AVNV and 0.29% for RODM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVNV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.