PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVNM vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVNM vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AVNM having a 14.81% return and VEA slightly higher at 14.92%.


AVNM

1D
-1.14%
1M
4.33%
YTD
14.81%
6M
17.96%
1Y
35.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVNM vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AVNM
Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF
14.81%38.30%5.52%8.60%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AVNM and VEA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023

0.97

The correlation between AVNM and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVNM vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVNM
VEA

Financial Services

23.2%
23.3%

Industrials

17.1%
19.2%

Technology

12.5%
13.8%

Basic Materials

11.7%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
7.5%

Energy

8.3%
5.4%

Healthcare

4.4%
8.2%

Communication Services

4.3%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
5.6%

Utilities

2.9%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.7%

Financial Services

AVNM
23.2%
VEA
23.3%

Industrials

AVNM
17.1%
VEA
19.2%

Technology

AVNM
12.5%
VEA
13.8%

Basic Materials

AVNM
11.7%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

AVNM
10.0%
VEA
7.5%

Energy

AVNM
8.3%
VEA
5.4%

Healthcare

AVNM
4.4%
VEA
8.2%

Communication Services

AVNM
4.3%
VEA
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

AVNM
3.9%
VEA
5.6%

Utilities

AVNM
2.9%
VEA
3.3%

Real Estate

AVNM
1.7%
VEA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVNM vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVNM
AVNM Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AVNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVNM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
AVNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVNM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVNM vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVNMVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.38

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

2.81

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.16

10.94

+1.22

AVNM vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVNM Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVNM and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVNMVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.09

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

0.25

+1.29

Drawdowns

AVNM vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVNM drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNM and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVNMVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.03%

-60.68%

+46.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-11.63%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-0.90%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-13.29%

+10.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.98%

-0.02%

Volatility

AVNM vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) is 5.19%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that AVNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVNMVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

5.66%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

13.32%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.82%

15.66%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.86%

16.55%

-1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

17.36%

-2.50%

AVNM vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVNM has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVNM vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

AVNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVNM
Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF
2.51%2.76%3.51%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, AVNM and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to AVNM (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNM dropped -14.03% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 1-year performance, AVNM leads with 35.92% vs 32.48% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, AVNM has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVNM has performed better with a 35.92% return vs 32.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for AVNM.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.51% for AVNM.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for AVNM and 0.03% for VEA.

AVNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVNM and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer