AVNM vs. AVES

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVNM (Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF) and AVES (Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVNM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while AVES is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVNM returned 35.92% vs 37.50% for AVES. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVNM charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVES.

Performance

AVNM vs. AVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVNM achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly lower than AVES's 16.79% return.

AVNM

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 14.81%
• 6M: 17.96%
• 1Y: 35.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVES

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 16.79%
• 6M: 19.15%
• 1Y: 37.50%
• 3Y*: 20.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVNM vs. AVES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF	14.81%	38.30%	5.52%	8.60%
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF	16.79%	30.49%	4.50%	9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AVNM and AVES is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.86

The correlation between AVNM and AVES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVNM vs. AVES - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVNM	AVES
Financial Services	23.2%	25.3%
Industrials	17.1%	13.3%
Technology	12.5%	21.4%
Basic Materials	11.7%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	9.6%
Energy	8.3%	4.0%
Healthcare	4.4%	2.1%
Communication Services	4.3%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	3.2%
Utilities	2.9%	1.7%
Real Estate	1.7%	2.4%

Return for Risk

AVNM vs. AVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVNM

AVNM Risk / Return Rank: 69
AVNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
AVNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AVNM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
AVNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AVNM Martin Ratio Rank: 65

AVES

AVES Risk / Return Rank: 61
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 65
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVNM vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVNM	AVES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.19	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	2.90	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.40	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	2.92	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.16	10.84	+1.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVNM vs. AVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVNM Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the AVES Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVNM and AVES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVNM	AVES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	2.19	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	0.61	+0.93

Drawdowns

AVNM vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVNM drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum AVES drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNM and AVES.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVNM	AVES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.03%	-27.40%	+13.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.59%	-12.90%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-1.36%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.55%	-7.73%	+5.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	3.47%	-0.51%

Volatility

AVNM vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) is 5.19%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that AVNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVNM	AVES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	6.93%	-1.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	14.44%	-1.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	17.19%	-2.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.86%	16.98%	-2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.86%	16.98%	-2.12%

AVNM vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVNM has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVNM vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison

AVNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than AVES's 2.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF	2.81%	3.17%	4.09%	3.96%	3.70%	0.62%
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF	2.51%	2.76%	3.51%	1.69%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVNM and AVES in my portfolio?

AVNM and AVES have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVNM or AVES?

AVES has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to AVNM (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNM dropped -14.03% vs AVES's -27.40%.

Which ETF is better, AVNM or AVES?

On 1-year performance, AVES leads with 37.50% vs 35.92% for AVNM. On fees, AVNM is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, AVNM has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVNM or AVES?

Over the 1-year period, AVES has performed better with a 37.50% return vs 35.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVNM or AVES?

AVNM is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVNM or AVES?

AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.51% for AVNM.

What is the main difference between AVNM and AVES?

AVNM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVES is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for AVNM and 0.36% for AVES.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.