PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVMV vs. AUSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AVMV vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AVMV vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AVMV
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF
4.44%10.46%18.43%15.56%
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
4.93%13.69%16.05%14.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVMV achieves a 4.44% return, which is significantly lower than AUSF's 4.93% return.


AVMV

1D
2.06%
1M
-3.81%
YTD
4.44%
6M
8.31%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AUSF

1D
1.17%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
4.93%
6M
5.58%
1Y
14.03%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AVMV vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

AVMV vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVMV
AVMV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AVMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

AUSF
AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVMV vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVMVAUSFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

0.98

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.61

1.40

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.20

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.40

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.84

6.04

+0.80

AVMV vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMV and AUSF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVMVAUSFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

0.98

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.64

+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between AVMV and AUSF is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AVMV vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

AVMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than AUSF's 2.71% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVMV
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF
1.09%1.20%1.30%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
2.71%2.78%2.63%1.83%2.51%2.22%2.95%4.02%1.46%

Drawdowns

AVMV vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMV drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, smaller than the maximum AUSF drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMV and AUSF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AVMVAUSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-44.25%

+20.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

-10.84%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-3.90%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-4.26%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.51%

+0.83%

Volatility

AVMV vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Value ETF (AVMV) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 3.22%. This indicates that AVMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AVMVAUSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

3.22%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

7.44%

+3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.68%

14.41%

+6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

13.69%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

19.25%

-0.86%