AVMU vs. ZMUN
AVMU (Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. AVMU is actively managed, while ZMUN is passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVMU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.
Performance
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVMU achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than ZMUN's 1.97% return.
AVMU
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 7.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMUN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVMU Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF | 0.98% | 2.63% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.97% | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVMU and ZMUN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVMU vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank
AVMU
ZMUN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVMU | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVMU drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMU and ZMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVMU | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.41% | -0.13% | -12.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | 0.00% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -0.02% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | — | — |
Volatility
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVMU | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19% | 0.54% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 0.54% | +3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.96% | 0.54% | +3.42% |
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVMU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison
AVMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than ZMUN's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVMU Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF | 3.52% | 3.50% | 3.32% | 2.50% | 1.29% | 0.77% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.59% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVMU and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVMU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVMU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.
AVMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.59% for ZMUN.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVMU and 0.30% for ZMUN.
Find the right allocation for AVMU and ZMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer