AVMU vs. ZMUN
AVMU (Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. AVMU is actively managed, while ZMUN is passively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVMU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.
Performance
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AVMU having a 1.64% return and ZMUN slightly lower at 1.59%.
AVMU
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 8.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMUN
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVMU Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF | 1.64% | 2.60% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.59% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVMU and ZMUN is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVMU vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank
AVMU
ZMUN
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVMU | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.58 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.91 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVMU | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 6.55 | -6.32 |
Drawdowns
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVMU drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMU and ZMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVMU | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.41% | -0.09% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | 0.00% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -0.01% | -3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVMU | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29% | 0.54% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.13% | 0.54% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.99% | 0.54% | +3.45% |
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVMU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVMU vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison
AVMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVMU Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF | 3.22% | 3.50% | 3.32% | 2.50% | 1.29% | 0.77% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.28% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVMU and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVMU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVMU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.
AVMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVMU and 0.30% for ZMUN.
Find the right allocation for AVMU and ZMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer