AVLV vs. PID
AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index, while PID is a Global Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVLV returned 23.23%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for PID. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVLV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.
Performance
AVLV vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVLV achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 5.45% return.
AVLV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 22.01%
- 1Y
- 38.77%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PID
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
AVLV vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 20.64% | 15.12% | 17.49% | 17.43% | -5.53% | 5.92% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 5.45% | 24.45% | 3.08% | 14.28% | -6.48% | 4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVLV and PID is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between AVLV and PID shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AVLV vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVLV
PID
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVLV
PID
Financial Services
AVLV
PID
Industrials
AVLV
PID
Energy
AVLV
PID
Consumer Cyclical
AVLV
PID
Consumer Defensive
AVLV
PID
Communication Services
AVLV
PID
Healthcare
AVLV
PID
Basic Materials
AVLV
PID
Utilities
AVLV
PID
Real Estate
AVLV
PID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVLV vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
AVLV
PID
AVLV vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVLV | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.30 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.09 | 2.16 | +3.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.39 | 7.36 | +17.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVLV | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 1.66 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.27 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
AVLV vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVLV drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLV and PID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVLV | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.50% | -66.34% | +46.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -7.47% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.50% | -13.34% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.19% | +2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -13.04% | +9.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 2.18% | -0.59% |
Volatility
AVLV vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.75%. This indicates that AVLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVLV | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 2.75% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 7.62% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 9.70% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 13.97% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 17.84% | -0.49% |
AVLV vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVLV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVLV vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than PID's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.58% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVLV and PID have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVLV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLV dropped -19.50% vs PID's -66.34%.
On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 12.52% for PID. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.
PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.
AVLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while PID is Global Equities. AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVLV and 0.56% for PID.
AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVLV and PID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer