PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVLV vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVLV vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVLV achieves a 24.25% return, which is significantly higher than MFUS's 18.47% return.


AVLV

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.67%
6M
14.22%
YTD
24.25%
1Y
37.16%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.09%

MFUS

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.87%
6M
12.16%
YTD
18.47%
1Y
26.56%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$101.24M$103.67M$155.64M
$802.46K$1.04M$960.78K

AVLV vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
24.25%15.12%17.49%17.43%-5.53%6.27%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
18.47%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between AVLV and MFUS is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021

0.93

The correlation between AVLV and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVLV vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVLV
MFUS

Financial Services

21.5%
11.3%

Technology

16.9%
25.8%

Industrials

15.3%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

14.2%
9.3%

Energy

12.7%
6.6%

Communication Services

6.7%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
9.3%

Healthcare

4.4%
14.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.5%

Utilities

0.4%
1.3%

Real Estate

0.0%
2.0%

Financial Services

AVLV
21.5%
MFUS
11.3%

Technology

AVLV
16.9%
MFUS
25.8%

Industrials

AVLV
15.3%
MFUS
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

AVLV
14.2%
MFUS
9.3%

Energy

AVLV
12.7%
MFUS
6.6%

Communication Services

AVLV
6.7%
MFUS
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

AVLV
6.2%
MFUS
9.3%

Healthcare

AVLV
4.4%
MFUS
14.7%

Basic Materials

AVLV
1.8%
MFUS
2.5%

Utilities

AVLV
0.4%
MFUS
1.3%

Real Estate

AVLV
0.0%
MFUS
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVLV vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVLV vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVLVMFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.42

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.84

4.18

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.65

15.77

+7.88

AVLV vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVLV Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVLV and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVLV vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVLV drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLV and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVLVMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-35.21%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-6.39%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

-15.39%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.57%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-3.95%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.69%

-0.11%

Volatility

AVLV vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) is 2.68%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that AVLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVLVMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

3.43%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

9.26%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

11.49%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

15.03%

+2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

17.29%

-0.12%

AVLV vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVLV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVLV vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than MFUS's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.04%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.35%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AVLV and MFUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MFUS has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to AVLV (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLV dropped -19.50% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 21.21% vs 20.62% for MFUS. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 21.21% return vs 20.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.04% for AVLV.

AVLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MFUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVLV and 0.30% for MFUS.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVLV and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer