PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVLV vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVLV vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVLV achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly higher than MFUS's 16.37% return.


AVLV

1D
0.14%
1M
5.75%
YTD
20.64%
6M
22.01%
1Y
38.77%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10Y*

MFUS

1D
0.03%
1M
5.72%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.58%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVLV vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
20.64%15.12%17.49%17.43%-5.53%5.92%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.37%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%5.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AVLV and MFUS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.93

The correlation between AVLV and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVLV vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVLV
MFUS

Technology

17.2%
21.8%

Financial Services

16.3%
12.6%

Industrials

15.4%
12.6%

Energy

14.4%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

14.1%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
10.3%

Communication Services

6.9%
5.3%

Healthcare

5.6%
13.5%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.8%

Utilities

0.3%
1.7%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.8%

Technology

AVLV
17.2%
MFUS
21.8%

Financial Services

AVLV
16.3%
MFUS
12.6%

Industrials

AVLV
15.4%
MFUS
12.6%

Energy

AVLV
14.4%
MFUS
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

AVLV
14.1%
MFUS
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

AVLV
7.7%
MFUS
10.3%

Communication Services

AVLV
6.9%
MFUS
5.3%

Healthcare

AVLV
5.6%
MFUS
13.5%

Basic Materials

AVLV
2.0%
MFUS
2.8%

Utilities

AVLV
0.3%
MFUS
1.7%

Real Estate

AVLV
0.1%
MFUS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVLV vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVLV vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVLVMFUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.18

2.63

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.39

3.77

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.47

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.09

4.41

+1.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.39

18.13

+6.26

AVLV vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVLV Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is comparable to the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVLV and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVLVMFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

2.63

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.79

+0.07

Drawdowns

AVLV vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVLV drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLV and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVLVMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-35.21%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-6.39%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

-15.39%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-4.00%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.55%

+0.04%

Volatility

AVLV vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) have volatilities of 3.12% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVLVMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

3.19%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

8.22%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

10.72%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

15.03%

+2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

17.35%

0.00%

AVLV vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVLV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVLV vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.07%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.36%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AVLV and MFUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to AVLV (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLV dropped -19.50% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 22.25% for MFUS. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 22.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.

AVLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MFUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. They also come from different issuers: American Century and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVLV and 0.30% for MFUS.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVLV and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer