AVLV vs. MFUS
AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index, while MFUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVLV returned 23.23%/yr vs 22.25%/yr for MFUS. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVLV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
AVLV vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVLV achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly higher than MFUS's 16.37% return.
AVLV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 22.01%
- 1Y
- 38.77%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
AVLV vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 20.64% | 15.12% | 17.49% | 17.43% | -5.53% | 5.92% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.37% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 5.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVLV and MFUS is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between AVLV and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVLV vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVLV
MFUS
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVLV
MFUS
Financial Services
AVLV
MFUS
Industrials
AVLV
MFUS
Energy
AVLV
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
AVLV
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
AVLV
MFUS
Communication Services
AVLV
MFUS
Healthcare
AVLV
MFUS
Basic Materials
AVLV
MFUS
Utilities
AVLV
MFUS
Real Estate
AVLV
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVLV vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
AVLV
MFUS
AVLV vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVLV | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.18 | 2.63 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.39 | 3.77 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.47 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.09 | 4.41 | +1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.39 | 18.13 | +6.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVLV | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 2.63 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.79 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
AVLV vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVLV drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLV and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVLV | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.50% | -35.21% | +15.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -6.39% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.50% | -15.39% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -4.00% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.55% | +0.04% |
Volatility
AVLV vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) have volatilities of 3.12% and 3.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVLV | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.19% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 8.22% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 10.72% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 15.03% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 17.35% | 0.00% |
AVLV vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVLV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVLV vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.58% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, AVLV and MFUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to AVLV (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLV dropped -19.50% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 22.25% for MFUS. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 22.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.
AVLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MFUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVLV and 0.30% for MFUS.
AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVLV and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer