PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVLV vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVLV vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVLV achieves a 21.54% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.41% return.


AVLV

1D
0.72%
1M
3.54%
YTD
21.54%
6M
21.48%
1Y
39.76%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-0.03%
1M
-21.94%
YTD
-27.41%
6M
-29.61%
1Y
-39.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVLV vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
21.54%15.12%18.35%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.41%-6.41%89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between AVLV and IBIT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVLV vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVLV vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVLVIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

0.85

+0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.07

-0.78

+6.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.12

-1.37

+25.50

AVLV vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVLV Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVLV and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVLV vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVLV drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLV and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVLVIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-52.11%

+32.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-52.11%

+45.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-49.45%

+49.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-16.53%

+12.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

29.64%

-28.03%

Volatility

AVLV vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) is 3.67%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that AVLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVLVIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

12.07%

-8.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

34.45%

-25.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

44.10%

-31.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

50.26%

-32.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

50.26%

-32.92%

AVLV vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVLV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVLV vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.37%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVLV and IBIT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to AVLV (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLV dropped -19.50% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

On 1-year performance, AVLV leads with 39.76% vs -39.67% for IBIT. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 39.76% return vs -39.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

AVLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

AVLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVLV and 0.25% for IBIT.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVLV and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer